Robert Hurt votes for resolution challenging prisoner exchange
Congressman Robert Hurt’s (R-Virginia) released a statement after voting in favor of H.Res. 644, a resolution of disapproval of the Obama administration’s failure to comply with the lawful statutory requirement of notifying Congress 30 days prior to the release of detainees from the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
“In transferring five senior members of the Taliban to the government of Qatar and failing to give Congress the appropriate notice, the Obama administration broke the law. The administration’s failure to notify Congress of the prisoner exchange was not only unlawful but also a clear and present danger to our national security. Unfortunately, this is an example of the President’s acting unilaterally and disregarding laws and Constitutional constraints. I was proud to cosponsor this resolution and see it pass the House with bipartisan support as a signal to the President that Congress will not tolerate the administration’s efforts to ignore U.S. law.”
Background on H.Res. 644
· On May 31, 2014, the Department of Defense (DoD) released five detainees from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the state of Qatar, as part of an agreement for the release of U.S. Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl.
· Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2014 requires that the Secretary of Defense notify relevant congressional committees at least 30 days before transferring or releasing individuals detained at guantanamo bay.
· Section 8111 of the FY 2014 DoD Appropriations Act prohibits funds from being used to transfer any individual at guantanamo bay except in accordance with section 1035 of the FY 2014 NDAA. On August 21, 2014, the Government Accountability Office found that the DoD violated this legal provision.
· In addition to condemning and disapproving of the Obama administration’s failure to comply with the lawful statutory requirement of notifying Congress, H.Res. 644 also expresses serious concern about the national security risks associated with this prisoner transfers and repercussions of negotiating with terrorists, even when conducted through intermediaries.