Home What is a Bellwether trial in the framework of class action lawsuits?
Local

What is a Bellwether trial in the framework of class action lawsuits?

Contributors
prescription drugs
Photo Credit: Photographee.eu

Bellwether trials serve as equivalent methods of coming to terms and dealing with complex or unfamiliar claims. These are often based on unique legal points of view and untested legal approaches.

Bellwether trials make the news big because they serve as sample trials of exciting new legal issues. Bellwether trials make history because they define new legal trends and affect future cases that might number in the thousands. Most often than not, these related cases are usually put on hold while waiting for the outcome of the bellwether trial. Such a type of trial gives plaintiffs, defendants, and courts a good sense of what to expect in a class-action lawsuit.

Defining and publicizing consumer risks

Many of these related cases are gathered into multidistrict litigation, MDL for short, because the cases often involve thousands of claims based on drug or product defects. Part of the informal purpose of a bellwether trial is to inform the public of injury risks caused by defective items. The legal system has tools for facilitating the handling of multiple lawsuits spread out over the entire United States. Combining cases into MDL is a popular strategy for dealing with multiple personal injury cases against the same defendant.

Do you have a Bellwether case?

If you’ve been injured by a prescription drug or a defective product, you may have grounds for a class action claim or lawsuit. The first thing to do is contact a class action lawsuit attorney for further information and legal advice. Most likely, several law firms will join forces in class action suits, each bringing their clients. However, one law firm is perfectly capable of handling a class action lawsuit with tens or hundreds of plaintiffs. You should pick the right attorney for this.

Not all class action suits become test cases for bellwether trials. Sometimes, only the most relevant ones make it to the court’s attention.

However, you can usually determine whether you have a bellwether case by the amount of publicity it generates. If popular local newscasters are scrambling to contact you for an interview and if your case serves to illustrate the points of articles educating the public about the trial issues, your case may be chosen as part of a current bellwether trial. These cases are often used to test the limits of settlements, so don’t expect an easy ride.

Pros and cons of Bellwether cases

If your case is chosen as a bellwether case, you can expect certain advantages and disadvantages. According to legal experts, more than one-third of all personal injury cases are pending while waiting on the results of a bellwether trial. The benefits of having your case designated a bellwether one include:

  • These cases can speed up MDL case settlements.
  • Second, they can reduce the costs of negotiating a settlement.
  • Third, they reduce legal fees by adding an element of certainty to negotiations.
  • Fourth, your attorney can use a bellwether case to test a variety of legal strategies.
  • Finally, they reduce the time spent on preparing for trial.
  • Plaintiffs not involved in bellwether trials might not get a chance to present their cases in court.

The cons of bellwether trials include:

  • Minuscule differences in circumstances often develop into full-blown losses during settlement negotiations.
  • As a result, related cases often devolve into showing differences from the bellwether case and arguing whether those differences should result in a greater or lesser settlement.
  • Bellwether cases face intensive media scrutiny over every aspect of the case.
  • As a result, embarrassing personal information often comes to light in bellwether cases.

The importance of Bellwether Trials for class action lawsuits and legislation

Bellwether cases are chosen because they clearly illustrate the legal issues as a subset of the circumstances that future litigation will likely generate. Bellwether cases are chosen based on simple yet strong building blocks, like the plaintiff’s appeal, the case’s circumstances, and strong legal evidence. The precedents set at trial serve as a template for greater settlements involving more similar cases. Bellwether cases try widely contested legal issues to understand what type of settlement plaintiffs could expect.

Moreover, bellwether trials are the secret engine running underneath policy and legal changes. One defective product can cause bruises, while one defective drug can cause cancer. Given their massive proportions and visibility, bellwether trials and class action lawsuits are game-changers for legislators, pushing them to pay more attention and offer actionable solutions for the public’s greater good.

 

Story by Mark Scott. With a law degree under his belt, Mark understood very early that law communication was a relatively neglected area. He decided to help people by “translating” the language and offering information and advice in a clear, useful, and actionable manner. For this reason, instead of finding him in court, you will most likely find his name online, where he is very active and thriving as a legal columnist. He aims to make it easier for people to understand when and how to seek legal counsel, how to proceed in a significant number of legal matters, and to find the proper resources so they can stand up for their rights.

 

Contributors

Contributors

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple PodcastsSpotifyPandora and YouTube.