Home ACLU says death row inmates should not be placed in solitary
Region

ACLU says death row inmates should not be placed in solitary

AFP

constitutionAttorneys for the ACLU and the ACLU of Virginia filed a friend-of-the-court brief today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on behalf of nine correctional experts, arguing that automatic solitary confinement for death row inmates is unconstitutional.

All Virginia offenders who are sentenced to death are assigned to solitary confinement for the remainder of their lives or until their sentence is overturned.  Typically, inmates serve at least six years in solitary while they pursue their appeals.

Death row prisoner Alfredo Prieto challenged Virginia’s system of automatic solitary confinement in 2012.  In November 2013, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that the system is unconstitutional.  Today’s brief supporting the decision was filed in the appeal of that ruling.

“The research is crystal clear — solitary confinement is extremely damaging to all prisoners and especially those with mental health issues,” said Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, executive director of the ACLU of Virginia.   “It is cruel and unnecessary to subject any human being to years of solitary confinement with no end in sight.”

Prisoners on Virginia’s death row remain in small cells for 23 hours a day.  They have no group meals or other opportunities to talk to other inmates.  Visits are extremely limited, and take place with glass partitions between the prisoner and the visitor. All other inmates in Virginia are subject to an individualized classification system, and, in theory, are placed in solitary only if they are found to be a serious threat to institutional safety.

The experts represented by the ACLU and ACLU of Virginia, who have decades of personal experience managing diverse prison populations, agree that there is no need to consign all death row inmates to automatic and permanent solitary confinement.

“Prolonged solitary confinement has no place in any prison system,” said Gastañaga.  “If it is used, however, it must be based on an individualized evaluation of the risk posed by a particular prisoner.  It is simply arbitrary to impose this dehumanizing treatment automatically on an entire category of people.”

Click here to read the brief.

 

 
 




Featured Video

 

AFP

AFP

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora and YouTube. Support AFP by signing up for our newsletter and/or powering our work with a one-time or monthly contribution.

Latest News

football grades
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: Two plays that changed the way the loss at SMU played out

measles illustration
Region

Virginia Department of Health confirms measles case in Harrisonburg

The Virginia Department of Health reported a confirmed case of measles in Harrisonburg, and has listed a potential exposure site – a local business.

uva football
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: The product is not worth the emotional investment anymore

I’m not going to be overly critical here, after the Virginia offense was, again, underwhelming, putting up less than 300 yards for the third straight game, this week leading to a 23-13 loss at #24 SMU.

uva football
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: Anemic ‘Hoos offense underwhelms again in 23-13 loss at SMU

staunton
Local

Staunton: Why was the EDA talking at length last week about a data center?

newspaper online news AFP mobile phone newsfeed
Local

Media Beat: The little mom-and-pop taking on the corporate giant, and winning

soccer sunset football gloves match
Go 'Hoos

Women’s Soccer: #18 Virginia scores in 86th minute, downs Virginia Tech, 1-0