Home ACLU says death row inmates should not be placed in solitary
Virginia

ACLU says death row inmates should not be placed in solitary

AFP

constitutionAttorneys for the ACLU and the ACLU of Virginia filed a friend-of-the-court brief today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on behalf of nine correctional experts, arguing that automatic solitary confinement for death row inmates is unconstitutional.

All Virginia offenders who are sentenced to death are assigned to solitary confinement for the remainder of their lives or until their sentence is overturned.  Typically, inmates serve at least six years in solitary while they pursue their appeals.

Death row prisoner Alfredo Prieto challenged Virginia’s system of automatic solitary confinement in 2012.  In November 2013, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that the system is unconstitutional.  Today’s brief supporting the decision was filed in the appeal of that ruling.

“The research is crystal clear — solitary confinement is extremely damaging to all prisoners and especially those with mental health issues,” said Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, executive director of the ACLU of Virginia.   “It is cruel and unnecessary to subject any human being to years of solitary confinement with no end in sight.”

Prisoners on Virginia’s death row remain in small cells for 23 hours a day.  They have no group meals or other opportunities to talk to other inmates.  Visits are extremely limited, and take place with glass partitions between the prisoner and the visitor. All other inmates in Virginia are subject to an individualized classification system, and, in theory, are placed in solitary only if they are found to be a serious threat to institutional safety.

The experts represented by the ACLU and ACLU of Virginia, who have decades of personal experience managing diverse prison populations, agree that there is no need to consign all death row inmates to automatic and permanent solitary confinement.

“Prolonged solitary confinement has no place in any prison system,” said Gastañaga.  “If it is used, however, it must be based on an individualized evaluation of the risk posed by a particular prisoner.  It is simply arbitrary to impose this dehumanizing treatment automatically on an entire category of people.”

Click here to read the brief.

 

 
 

 




Featured Video

 

AFP

AFP

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora and YouTube. Support AFP by signing up for our newsletter and/or powering our work with a one-time or monthly contribution.

Latest News

budget CPI household housing
Local

Waynesboro: HERO attacks homelessness issue from a different angle

medicaid
Virginia

Richmond couple gets jail time for bilking Medicaid out of a million bucks

A Richmond couple is getting jail time for orchestrating a scheme to overbill Medicaid for mental health services to the tune of nearly a million dollars, and using the money to purchase luxury cars, fund a vegan restaurant and make lease payments on their residence. Erica Jackson, 39, was sentenced on Tuesday to four years...

data center virginia
Politics, Virginia

Pause to Protect coalition calls for moratorium on data center construction

A coalition of environmental groups is calling for a moratorium on new data center construction in Virginia until developers can show that they can meet specific environmental goals and standards on clean energy, water use and transparency.

newspaper online news AFP mobile phone newsfeed
Local

Thought exercise: How Waynesboro is different, if Augusta Free Press never existed

tony elliott
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: Tony Elliott filibusters his way through a 14-minute answer to a question

uva basketball nolan adekunle
Basketball, Go 'Hoos

UVA Basketball Notebook: Adekunle adjusts to U.S. game, tempo on overdrive

police court law
Local

Mennonite kidnapping trial: Valerie Hayes, co-defendant, will have separate trials