Home Study debunks 10 most popular claims against GMOs
Region/State

Study debunks 10 most popular claims against GMOs

Chris Graham

newspaperIn light of the ongoing debate over genetically modified organisms,Popular Science magazine interviewed nearly a dozen scientists about 10 of the most common claims about GMOs.

Based on their findings, consumers have “not much at all” to fear from GMOs.

One claim is that GMOs are too new to know if they are dangerous. Popular Sciencenotes that genetically engineered plants first appeared about 30 years ago and became commercially produced in 1994. Since then, more than 1,700 peer-reviewed safety studies have been published, and the consensus is that GMOs are no more risky than conventional crops.

Another claim is that genetic engineering is a radical technology. According to the article, “humans have been manipulating the genes of crops for millennia,” and virtually all food crops have been genetically modified in some way.

“The article makes a number of good points regarding the responsibility that we in agriculture have to feed the growing world population in a responsible manner, and how the use of biotechnology is integral to addressing that challenge,” said Lindsay Reames, Virginia Farm Bureau Federation assistant director of governmental relations.

The technique used for genetic modification differs from traditional plant breeding in that scientists extract DNA from an organism, modify it and then incorporate it into the genome of the same species or a different one. “With GMOs, we know the genetic information we are using, we know where it goes in the genome, and we can see if it is near an allergen or a toxin or if it is going to turn another gene off,” said Dr. Peggy Lemaux, a plant biologist at the University of California, Berkeley.

Another concern about GMOs is that they cause allergies, cancer and other health problems. But biotech companies perform extensive allergy and toxicity testing. Researchers from Italy published a review of 1,700 GMO safety tests—770 of which examined the health impact on humans or animals—and they found no evidence that the foods are dangerous.

Popular Science said that the claim that all research on GMOs has been funded by “big ag” “simply isn’t true. Over the past decade, hundreds of independent researchers have published peer-reviewed safety studies.”

Featured Video

 




Chris Graham

Chris Graham

Chris Graham is the founder and editor of Augusta Free Press. A 1994 alum of the University of Virginia, Chris is the author and co-author of seven books, including Poverty of Imagination, a memoir published in 2019. For his commentaries on news, sports and politics, go to his YouTube page, TikTok, BlueSky, or subscribe to his Street Knowledge podcast. Email Chris at [email protected]. Support AFP by signing up for our newsletter and/or powering our work with a one-time or monthly contribution.

Latest News

constitution
Trump's America

John Whitehead | When everything becomes a national security threat

kline's dairy bar
Local

Kline’s Dairy Bar fundraiser benefiting the Virginia Breast Cancer Foundation

Plunk down twenty bucks for one of the new Kline’s Dairy Bar breast cancer awareness T-shirts, and the twenty bucks – all of it – will go to the Virginia Breast Cancer Foundation.

uva football beau pribula
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: Tony Elliott addresses issues with Beau Pribula, offense

I remember, back in Year 1, getting upset, a few times, with UVA Football coach Tony Elliott when it seemed he would throw his guys, particularly his QB1, Brennan Armstrong, under the bus, when things weren’t going well, which in Year 1, was often.

jim wood facebook
Local

Waynesboro: Jim Wood dismisses concerns about Northrop Grumman pollution

police officer on city street at night
Local

Update: Portsmouth man killed in officer-involved shooting in Staunton

uva marching band
Football, Go 'Hoos

WVU fans hit UVA Marching Band with ‘homophobic and racist slurs, antisemitism’

ncaa
Football

Tim Kaine votes no on Protect College Sports Act: Bill ‘not ready for primetime’