Home Judge rules state board violated federal law in Wise County coal-fired plant case
Virginia News

Judge rules state board violated federal law in Wise County coal-fired plant case

Contributors

In a momentous victory for clean energy advocates in Virginia, a Richmond Circuit Court judge ruled today that the State Air Pollution Control Board violated federal environmental law in permitting Dominion Power’s coal-fired power plant in Wise County in the southwest corner of the state.

Judge Margaret P. Spencer agreed with a coalition of environmental groups that the “escape hatch” in Dominion’s Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) permit rendered that permit unlawful.

The Clean Air Act’s MACT program regulates emissions of hazardous air toxics, such as mercury, which can cause severe neurological deficits in infants, fetuses and young children. Judge Spencer ruled that the “mercury emission limit … must be set ‘irrespective of cost or achievability,’” and that the “escape hatch” was “violative of the laws addressing pre-construction mandates.” When Congress passed the Clean Air Act, it required that such permits be obtained before construction begins on a power plant, to ensure that it is designed and built in a way to protect the public health and welfare.

Dominion, which started construction a week after the Virginia air board approved the permits in June 2008, has said the plant is about 20 percent complete.

The judge’s ruling granted the coalition’s requested relief, which was to invalidate the MACT permit. In addition to the challenge on the mercury permit, the coalition also sued the air board in July 2008 for issuing a permit that failed to adequately limit emissions from the coal plant of approximately 5.4 million tons a year of carbon dioxide, small particles of soot, and other so-called “conventional” pollutants.

The court affirmed the “Prevention of Significant Deterioration” (“PSD”) permit, regulating conventional pollutants.

The Wise Energy for Virginia Coalition has raised a host of concerns about the Wise County coal plant over the last several years, including air pollution and the health of the local community, water quality, mountaintop removal coal mining, and the impacts of the plant’s carbon emissions on global warming. Some 42,500 Virginians from across the state signed petitions and sent letters and comments to state and company officials opposing the project.

Contributors

Contributors

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple PodcastsSpotifyPandora and YouTube.

Latest News

drone
Politics, U.S. & World News

Congresswoman McClellan reintroduces legislation for drone use in wildfires

online survey
Local News

Harrisonburg: VDOT welcomes public input on Vine Street in online survey

The public is invited to participate in an online survey, Tuesday, January 21 to Tuesday, February 4, 2025, regarding a 1.4-mile segment of Vine Street in Harrisonburg. The segment of Vine Street that the Virginia Department of Transportation requests comment on is between U.S. 33 and U.S. 11. Input opportunities include how Vine Street is...

Arts & Culture, Virginia News

NAACP president Derrick Johnson to speak at Mary Washington

Derrick Johnson, president and CEO of the NAACP since 2017, will speak Wednesday, January 22, 2025, at the University of Mary Washington. His words will reflect on the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.‘s enduring legacy in the United States. Johnson has spent decades advocating also for fairness, equality and the underserved, just as King...

constitution
Politics, U.S. & World News

Biden declares Equal Rights Amendment law of the land: Setting up constitutional fight

cold case crime
Virginia News

Arlington County Police seek information on 2020 Scott Ratigan murder

latasha lattimore uva basketball
Basketball, Sports

Women’s Basketball: Virginia gets second road W in a week, defeats Virginia Tech, 73-65

prescription drug bottle
Politics, Virginia News

Republicans cite insurance profits as excuse to fight effort to rein in prescription drug prices