jump to example.com

Friends of Nelson joins grassroots coalition protesting FERC over proposed pipeline

friends of nelsonToday, on the steps outside the Washington office of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Friends of Nelson is protesting what it calls FERC’s flagrant disregard for the public in the permitting process for the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline.

Nelson County residents have joined activists and organizations all over the East and Northeast in opposing what they feel is FERC’s abuse of its responsibility to fairly consider the public and their comments.

“We want FERC and its commissioners to know that we are here this week because their complicity to route the ACP through our home deeply violates so many of our personal and community values,” said Joanna Salidis, president of Friends of Nelson. “Nelson County property owners want FERC to uphold their claim that eminent domain is a method of last resort — not a gift from the government to maximize profit on the backs of unwilling private property owners and communities.”

This week, citizens from many states across the country have gathered to protest FERC’s rubber stamping and undemocratic processes. The FERC’s protestors include residents of communities along the ACP route and other proposed pipelines who are demanding that their health and well-being should not be sacrificed for corporate profit and foreign customers. The protestors also oppose FERC’s approval of the Cove Point LNG facility in Maryland.

Beyond Extreme Energy, Qualmless organizer Jimmy Betts said, “The bullying and deceptive tactics of how fracked gas infrastructure projects, like LNG export terminals, are permitted for private profits at the expense of our planet’s water, soil, air, climate, and human and natural rights, should be reason enough to question and ultimately block these devastating fossil fuel follies.”

“People have come from Vermont, Maryland, New York, Nebraska, Virginia,” said Anne Buteau, who came from Nelson County for the protest. Joyce Burton, who was also present, said, “Many communities are being hurt by the FERC’s practice of indiscriminately approving every fossil fuel pipeline project that comes across their desks, no matter how ill-conceived.”


“FERC has denied the public the right to participate in the process,” said Ernie Reed of Friends of Nelson. “It has set an unrealistic schedule for a process that needs time to be done correctly. FERC has closed its eyes and ears to the public and we are here to bring attention to this fact.”

Friends of Nelson cite the facts that:

  • ·FERC turned away more than 200 people wishing to comment publicly at FERC scoping meetings in Augusta and Nelson Counties in March of this year.
  • FERC failed to make good on its promise to hold an open house or scoping meeting in Buckingham County, where a proposed compressor station would turn an area dominated by agricultural development into a polluting, industrial landscape.
  • FERC’s transcription of public comments from the scoping meetings, intended to identify issues to include in the environmental analysis, was so full of errors it is incomprehensible.
  • FERC failed to extend its scoping period for public input despite reasonable and repeated requests made by Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, Fifth District Congressman Robert Hurt and hundreds of Virginia residents to do so.
  • FERC set an unreasonably short time period of two weeks for Dominion to respond in full to over 20,000 comments submitted on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
  • FERC continues to permit dozen of pipeline proposals despite the absence of a national energy policy that recognizes the potential contributions of renewable energy to local and regional energy supplies.

“The FERC process fails to protect the public and weigh harm versus need,” said Salidis. “We’ve seen that FERC doesn’t work even with our own limited experience, but other communities who have been dragged through the entire regulatory process provide more definitive examples. FERC’s business as usual allows industry to claim domestic use and need, even when the gas is destined for export. We know that the ACP fracked gas will similarly be exported if it is more profitable, while property owners and communities are left paying the price of lost property values, rural heritage, and clean water.”

Friends of Nelson and hundreds of citizens have asked that FERC halt the permitting process until FERC produces a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement documenting the cumulative impacts of all three pipelines proposed for the Allegheny Blue Ridge region –The Atlantic Coast Pipeline, the Mountain Valley Pipeline and the Appalachian Connector – together.

“Three 42-inch pipelines with the same source and the same terminus that serve the same purposes must be considered as one single project,” said Salidis.

“Dominion claims to FERC that they cannot afford to take the time to give the process due diligence,” said Reed. “We submit that FERC cannot afford not to fully engage the public in the process.”

  • Maria Schicklgruber

    How many of those “yes” answers are coming from industry employees? I
    haven’t read a single pro-pipeline comment to FERC that was not written
    by an industry employee or someone who wasn’t completely informed.

    John Watson, the FACT IS that methane is released, lots of it, too.
    According to the EPA, “methane emissions occur in all sectors of the
    natural gas industry, from production, through processing and
    transmission, to distribution. http://www.epa.gov/methane/gasstar/basic-information/index.html

    It’s not methane causing the rotten smell that’s emanating from
    these pipeline deals, though; it’s corruption. If industry money didn’t
    put our elected officials into office, we wouldn’t be having this

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is made up of former and
    future energy company employees. The consultant that they chose to
    prepare the proposed PennEast Pipeline’s environmental impact statement,
    Tetra Tech from Pasadena California, is actually a member of the
    Marcellus Shale Coalition (whose purpose is to promote fracking and
    bring Marcellus Shale gas to market). The FERC knows it, and is not
    troubled at all by this outrageous conflict of interest.

    The fracked gas in this pipeline is not going to serve the residents
    and businesses along the pipeline route. We already have plenty of gas.
    It is headed straight for the shiny new liquified natural gas (LNG)
    export facility, Cove Point, on the Chesapeake (which the FERC recently
    approved), then off to the highest bidders in Japan and India. http://analysisreport.morningstar.com/stock/research/c-report?t=XNYS:D&region=usa&culture=en-US&productcode=MLE&cur AGL Resources is a PennEast partner and is also a partner in the Cove Point LNG export facility.

    The FERC is an American federal agency who states their own mission
    as “Reliable, Efficient, and Sustainable Energy for Customers.” http://ferc.gov/about/about.asp
    Why would they approve not one, but multiple American gas export
    facilities? Why would they allow a private company to ship our own
    American gas overseas for its own corporate gain? How, exactly, does
    that provide “efficient, sustainable energy” for American customers?
    Won’t this reduce the amount of gas in the American market and actually
    drive our domestic prices up? Won’t reducing the amount of gas we have
    here, just make us more dependent on foreign fuel later? Won’t that put
    our country at risk of higher prices, or worse, war. Why would the FERC,
    by allowing eminent domain, take away the private property of American
    citizens and preserved land (paid for by our taxes) to run a pipeline to
    export our own gas? Why would they damage our farms and contaminate our
    water supply so corporate investors can make more money?

    NJ Spotlight, as a member of the free press – which is protected by
    the Constitution – you have a responsibility to find these answers and
    report them to the American public, not just provide another paid
    program for the gas Industry. Let’s see an informed, balanced panel
    debate the facts.

    Posted by hopewellian on May 29 at 12:42 AM

  • Maria Schicklgruber

    How does using existing and new pipelines that were built under eminent domain laws allow for exporting our Nat Gas ?

    When you export Nat Gas U should build new pipelines from the well heads to
    the export terminals without using eminent domain laws !

    Eminent domain laws are for public good NOT private profit !!!

  • Pingback: Retired Police Captain: I Trust #Anonymous More than the Feds()

  • Pingback: Retired Police Captain: I Trust #Anonymous More than the Feds - Freedom's Floodgates()

  • Pingback: Characterization of Protein Therapeutics using Mass Spectrometry free downloads()

  • Pingback: RTO Insider's Federal Briefs: Week of June 2, 2015()