Home Statement of Sen. Petersen after Governor McAuliffe veto of anti-surveillance legislation

Statement of Sen. Petersen after Governor McAuliffe veto of anti-surveillance legislation

chap-petersen-headerIncluded below is a statement from Senator Chap Petersen (D-Fairfax) in response to Governor Terry McAuliffe’s veto of SB 965. The statement is from Senator Petersen’s blog, OxRoadSouth.com.

First of all, I like the Governor and support his policies on economic development, which have brought thousands of new jobs to Virginia.  I also consider him a friend, and sometimes friends disagree, especially when they are both Democrats.  
Having said that, I believe that he’s getting some very bad advice here, both legally and politically.
First of all, this bill was not “rushed through.”  The issue has been pending since March 2013, when the Attorney General ruled that License Plate Readers could not be used, except in criminal investigations.  Certain police departments refused to follow that opinion, which led to these bills.
Delegate Anderson and myself filed our legislation in January 2014, after a series of Washington Post articles on the unauthorized use of LPR’s.  We continued our bills for a year so as to get the maximum possible input from all sides of the debate
We pre-filed our respective bills (again) before the 2015 session.  There were at least four Committee hearings on our bills, as well as multiple floor debates.  The final product of SB 965 was reached by a bipartisan conference committee and unanimously approved by the House and Senate in February — after a deliberative process of over a year.  
Secondly, the bill is not “bad legislation.”  It was carefully written to only impact “surveillance technologies” which scan and upload personal information.  On its face, it applies to random data collection – not data collected pursuant to a specific investigation or from a specific encounter.  Contrary to the exaggerated claims of opponents, it had no effect on cameras focused on government property or personnel.  
There is no need for the Commonwealth to be collecting private information on its own citizens, without a warrant or investigation. It is time for that Patriot Act mentality to end.    
Law enforcement in this state does a great job.  I’m proud to support them.  But they only have those powers delegated by the Constitution and state law. It is not unlimited.
Today’s veto sends just the opposite message.



Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple PodcastsSpotifyPandora and YouTube.