Home McAuliffe vetoes legislation increasing Virginia’s exposure to nuisance suits
Local News

McAuliffe vetoes legislation increasing Virginia’s exposure to nuisance suits

virginia general assemblyGovernor Terry McAuliffe today vetoed Senate Bill 543, which would have required an award of attorneys’ fees and other costs when a plaintiff wins or settles an inverse condemnation suit for “damaging” property, even when such damage is de minimis.

The Governor originally amended the legislation to cap such damages in order to protect the Commonwealth against costly nuisance suits, but the General Assembly rejected his amendment.

 

The Governor’s full veto statement

Pursuant to Article V, Section 6, of the Constitution of Virginia, I veto Senate Bill 543, which requires an award of attorneys’ fees and other costs when a plaintiff wins or settles an inverse condemnation suit for “damaging” property, even when such damage is de minimis.

Money damages are already authorized for both takings of and damage to private property by government actions, through suits for inverse condemnation.  In the event of a permanent taking by a governmental entity, a plaintiff is entitled to his or her attorneys’ fees and costs.  Senate Bill 543 would extend the award of those fees and costs to suits in which a landowner’s property was not completely taken but only impaired, even if that impairment is nominal.

I am not opposed to the award of attorneys’ fees and costs in damages cases, within reason. As Governor, I am responsible for the fiscal health of Virginia, and I take my obligations as a steward of taxpayers’ money seriously.  Accordingly, I proposed an amendment to Senate Bill 543 seeking to cap attorneys’ fees and costs in damages cases to two hundred percent of the monetary award for the damage itself.  This would have eliminated the incentive for nuisance lawsuits by unscrupulous attorneys seeking to enrich themselves at taxpayers’ expense in those cases where any actual damage was de minimis.  The General Assembly elected to return Senate Bill 543 to me in its original form.  Without some safeguard against unlimited exposure of taxpayer funds to litigation costs for nuisance suits, I cannot support this legislation.

Contributors

Contributors

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple PodcastsSpotifyPandora and YouTube.

Latest News

betwhale
Sports

BetWhale Promo Code For Super Bowl 2025 Free Bets: Claim $1,250 Welcome Bonus

Sports

How To Bet On Super Bowl 2025 In USA – US Sports Betting Sites & Apps

Absolutely anyone who lives in the USA is eligible to bet on the Super Bowl thanks to these eight top US sports betting sites. Join us as we outline how you can claim thousands of dollars worth of free bets to use on Super Bowl 59 tonight, as the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles...

super bowl
Sports

How To Bet On The Super Bowl Coin Toss On USA Sports Betting Apps

Betting on the Super Bowl coin toss? Wagering on the coin toss is one of the most popular bets fans make due to its simplicity and you can do so too by using the best USA Sports Betting Apps. How to Get Free Bets for Super Bowl Coin Toss Betting To start placing your bets...

Sports

How To Bet On The Super Bowl 2025 National Anthem

jeffrey dumars
Local News

Albemarle County names new director of Facilities and Environmental Services

How To Bet On Super Bowl BetOnline
Sports News

BetOnline Promo Code For Super Bowl Free Bet: $250 Welcome Bonus (50% First Deposit) 

leon henry
Local News

Charlottesville: City names Leon Henry new director of social services