Home Environmental intervenors withdraw from CAFO case
Local

Environmental intervenors withdraw from CAFO case

Contributors

earth-newIn light of the EPA decision to withdraw its appeal of the West Virginia district court decision in the case of Alt v. EPA, Environmental Intervenors, Potomac Riverkeeper, Inc., Food & Water Watch, West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Waterkeeper Alliance, and Center for Food Safety,on Thursday asked the court to dismiss their appeal.

Environmental Intervenors, who were represented in the case by Earthjustice, the Columbia Environmental Law Clinic, and the Center for Food Safety, are deeply disappointed in the EPA’s decision to drop its appeal of a ruling that misapplied Clean Water Act permitting requirements for a confined poultry growing facility.  In the suit, the facility admitted it discharges pollutants into a tributary to the Potomac River.

Environmental Intervenors urge EPA to step up enforcement of the Clean Water Act by ensuring that large confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) obtain permits to control discharges of animal waste.  Although CAFOs remain one of the largest unaddressed sources of pollution in the United States, EPA reported in 2013 that only 36 percent of the largest identified CAFOs have obtained Clean Water Act permits.  Unregulated animal waste discharges from CAFOs are substantial contributors to water quality problems, including harmful algae blooms and dead zones, in the Potomac River and Chesapeake Bay watersheds.

Contributors

Contributors

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple PodcastsSpotifyPandora and YouTube.