When most people think of a personal injury case, they imagine a dramatic courtroom scene with a judge and a jury. However, the reality is that the majority of these situations are settled in quiet offices and over phone calls long before anyone steps into a court. A massive part of these talks involves figuring out who was actually at fault and by what amount.
How fault percentages are secretly negotiated before a personal injury case goes to court is a process driven by data, evidence, and specific state laws. Since most accidents are not 100% one person’s fault, lawyers and insurance adjusters spend a lot of time trading percentages. This number is significant because it directly changes the amount an injured person receives to pay for their medical bills.
How do insurance adjusters calculate initial fault?
Insurance companies utilize internal software and historical data to establish an initial valuation for an accident claim. Adjusters look at police reports and photos, seeking opportunities to shift a percentage of blame onto the claimant. Consequently, negotiations routinely begin with a lower settlement offer based on an unfavorable fault split.
Jurisdiction-specific comparative negligence laws heavily dictate how these percentages impact final compensation. Depending on local statutes, even a minor shift in assigned fault can significantly reduce financial recovery or bar an individual from receiving damages entirely, making early liability negotiations critical to the outcome.
How is evidence used to shift blame during talks?
Evidence is a foundational tool used during settlement discussions to establish liability. Lawyers use specific pieces of information to force insurance companies to lower the fault percentage they assigned to the victim.
Brent Stewart, a South Carolina personal injury lawyer and founder of Stewart Law Offices, the Post and Courier’s 2026 Best Overall Law Firm, stated, “In the pre-trial phase, evidence acts as the ultimate currency; the goal is not simply to tell a story, but to use hard data to dismantle the insurance company’s attempt to devalue a claim by unfairly shifting blame.”
- Black Box Data: Many modern cars have Event Data Recorders that show how fast a car was going or if the brakes were applied.
- Video Footage: Doorbell cameras and dashcams provide objective proof that overrides a biased witness statement.
- Cell Phone Records: These can prove if a driver was texting or distracted at the exact moment of impact.
- Witness Statements: Neutral third parties who saw the event can provide a different perspective than the people involved.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) reports that approximately 73.4% of tort cases are disposed of through an agreed settlement. This highlights why the negotiation of fault percentages is often the most important part of a legal claim.
When do lawyers use spoliation letters to protect a case?
During the negotiation phase, it is vital to ensure that evidence does not disappear. Lawyers often send something called a spoliation letter. This is a formal legal notice demanding that the other party preserve all evidence related to the accident, such as truck driving logs or security tapes. If a company deletes a video after receiving this letter, it can face heavy penalties in court.
This threat often makes them more willing to negotiate a fair fault percentage. Recent figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that deaths from crashes in 2023 resulted in over $457 billion in total costs. These high costs explain why insurance companies fight so hard to shift even 5% of fault, as it significantly impacts their bottom line.
What role does medical documentation play in fault?
It might seem strange, but medical records are often used to argue about fault. If an injured person waited three weeks to see a doctor, the insurance company will argue that the person failed to mitigate damages. They might claim the injury was actually caused by something else, using this as leverage to increase the victim’s fault percentage. Detailed, immediate medical records make it harder for adjusters to use these tactics.
This content is provided for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. AFP editorial staff were not involved in the creation of this content.
Support AFP
Share
