Lawrence S. Wittner: Which way to national security?
On April 1, Donald Trump startled the world by publicly declaring that he was “absolutely” considering withdrawing the United States from the 77-year-old NATO alliance.
On April 1, Donald Trump startled the world by publicly declaring that he was “absolutely” considering withdrawing the United States from the 77-year-old NATO alliance.
Donald Trump, who famously doesn’t like “windmills,” had his underlings find an excuse to pause billions of dollars in offshore wind projects, and what they came up with his comical: “national security risks.”
The CIA was created by Congress in 1947 in response to the lack of inter-agency communication before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941.
The race between the United States and China to be No. 1 in AI has put China ahead of America with a Trump Administration reversal.
National security is not just about what happens on the battlefield. It is also about protecting our institutions at home, including the integrity of our legal system.
President Donald Trump’s rescissions bill includes up to $125 million in cuts for the Clean Technology Fund at the Climate Investment Funds.
As a Virginian who fled Ukraine with my family just weeks before Russia’s full-scale invasion three years ago, I know what happens when the world hesitates in the face of authoritarian aggression.
Have human institutions evolved sufficiently to cope with the modern world? When it comes to national security, the answer appears to be: No.
Sixth District Democratic congressional nominee Ken Mitchell has the endorsement of National Security Leaders For America, a nonprofit representing more than 700 senior national security leaders.
In recent weeks, the Biden administration has found itself facing a serious dilemma as to how to balance its commitment to Israel’s national security along with the humanitarian crisis facing the Palestinians in Gaza.