Home Washington Redskins file appeal of trademark decision
Sports

Washington Redskins file appeal of trademark decision

redskins-helmetThe Washington Redskins NFL team filed its appeal of the split decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ordering cancellation of the Washington Redskins’ long-held federal trademark registrations.

The appeal is in the form of a complaint, effectively starting the litigation anew, this time in a federal court before a federal judge, and not in the administrative agency that issued the recent split decision.

“We believe that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ignored both federal case law and the weight of the evidence, and we look forward to having a federal court review this obviously flawed decision,” said Bob Raskopf, trademark attorney for the Washington Redskins.

The Redskins’ complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, explains why the Court should reverse the Board’s order and properly find that Native Americans did not consider the team name “Washington Redskins” to be disparaging during the relevant time frame of 1967-1990.  While the complaint points out the many errors in the Board’s decision, the federal judge may disregard the Board’s decision entirely in conducting its own independent evaluation of the evidence.

The complaint also asks the federal court to consider the serious Constitutional issues that the Board lacked the authority to address.  Specifically, by cancelling valuable, decades-old registrations, the Board improperly penalized the Washington Redskins based on the content of the team’s speech in violation of the First Amendment.  The complaint also alleges that the team has been unfairly deprived of its valuable and long-held intellectual property rights in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

“The Washington Redskins look forward to all of the issues in the case being heard in federal court under the federal rules of evidence.  The team is optimistic that the court will correctly and carefully evaluate the proofs, listen to the arguments, and confirm the validity of the Washington Redskins’ federal trademark registrations, just as another federal court has already found in a virtually identical case,” Raskopf said.

While the case is in federal court, the Washington Redskins’ federal trademark registrations remain in full force and effect.  As always, the Washington Redskins has the right to use its marks and to enforce them against infringers and counterfeiters.

Support AFP




Contributors

Contributors

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple PodcastsSpotifyPandora and YouTube.

Latest News

uva baseball chris pollard
Baseball

UVA Baseball: ‘Hoos headed to Texas in February to compete in hellacious round-robin field

mjf aew worlds end
Etc.

AEW Notebook: ‘Dynamite’ viewer number up, ‘Forbidden Door’ preview, FTR news

We had to wait an extra day, plus the weekend, for viewer numbers from last week’s AEW “Dynamite,” with the Juneteenth holiday falling on Friday.

Gregory Washington George Mason
Politics, Virginia

George Mason extends the contract of President Gregory Washington through 2031

The Youngkin MAGAs sacked presidents at UVA, Virginia Tech and VMI – but they didn’t get Gregory Washington at George Mason University, who, it was announced on Tuesday, had his contract extended by the school’s Board of Visitors through June 30, 2031.

brian white virginia tech
Etc.

Virginia Tech names Florida Atlantic AD Brian White as the new director of athletics

trash middle river augusta county
Local

Augusta County: Illegal dumping becomes somebody else’s problem

missing person
Local

Missing person alert: Augusta County man last seen on June 11

joe tiroly uva baseball
Baseball

UVA Baseball: Four ‘Hoos get invites to the 2026 MLB Draft Combine