Home The Pulse | Politics beyond health care
News and Views

The Pulse | Politics beyond health care

AFP

 
Column by Chris Graham
[email protected]

It can be easy to get myopic in our Who won today? scoreboard-focused political world, and in so doing assume that what’s majorly important today, like the months-old health-care debate, will be important tomorrow, next month and forever.

Even recent history suggests to us that politics is as much about the Janet Jackson 1980s song “What Have You Done For Me Lately?” as what happened even a couple of weeks ago.

It’s in that context that I bring up how I was talking recently with my friend Quentin Kidd, a political scientist at Christopher Newport University, about the political ramifications of the health-care debate on upcoming congressional elections in 2010.

Kidd’s first observation: “Once a bill passes, I think Republican opposition, which has been centered around fighting a bill from being passed, is going to dissipate.”

The reasoning: “It’s hard to be organized around opposing something that is the law.”

Good observation, good reasoning. I hadn’t thought of it this way, but yes, it does seem that there will be a creep toward inertia as it becomes accepted that whatever reform is the law of the land.

Kidd’s reckoning is that with the passage of a reform bill “the president’s approval rating goes up six or eight points” immediately thereafter, and members of Congress will be able to pull away from the national-issues front to focus on micro-level issues in their districts.

“Right now, everybody is sort of being sucked into the health-care vortex, but once it becomes law, it’s sort of off the table, it’s a done deal, and everybody can focus on what’s important to their district and focus on issues that are important to them and their constituents,” Kidd said.

It won’t take long for health care to have disappeared from the rearview mirror. “We’re not going to be talking about health care in the middle of the summer in 2010 if Obama signs a health-care bill into law in January,” Kidd said.

What will we be talking about? Kidd has an interesting thought there.

“You know what I think we’re going to be talking about? Immigration. I think that’s a tactical move on the part of the administration. Once health care is passed, to shift to a topic that’s going to divide Republicans,” Kidd said.

Food for thought …

  

 
 

 




Featured Video

 

AFP

AFP

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora and YouTube. Support AFP by signing up for our newsletter and/or powering our work with a one-time or monthly contribution.

Latest News

newspaper online news AFP mobile phone newsfeed
Local

The ‘free’ in Augusta Free Press isn’t entirely free: There’s a cost to doing business

Inman Majors
Local

Inman Majors, former Waynesboro guy, releases new novel, ‘Arizona Showdown’

A writing buddy, Inman Majors, former resident of Waynesboro, now living across the continent out in Arizona, but still doing good things here in Virginia, is now his own publisher, in addition to being an author and philanthropist.

donald trump jd vance
Politics

Trump wants Vance to focus on ‘CORRUPTION’: No, not within the Trump administration

The leader of the most corrupt administration in U.S. history – apologies to Warren G. Harding, but the Teapot Domers have been lapped by this one – is pulling Vice President JD Vance from negotiations to end the pointless Iran war to focus on “CORRUPTION.”

vcu
Football

VCU rebounds from heartbreaking loss at Memphis, easily dispatches NJIT, 87-49

kenneth lambert
Sports

West Virginia native Kenneth Lambert training for solo row across the Atlantic

uva basketball swish
Basketball, Go 'Hoos

UVA Basketball: #6 Virginia set to face Maryland in Friday night primetime matchup

college football
Football

Buffalo Gap High School comes up short in $1M football field contest