Home Ivy Main | Protecting the vote
Sports

Ivy Main | Protecting the vote

AFP

Two years ago the Virginia legislature took a major first step towards verifiable voting by passing a law banning localities from buying any more of the paperless electronic voting machines known as DREs — the computers that most of us have been voting on, but which have been shown nationwide to be prone to failure, subject to programming errors, and vulnerable to manipulation.

Since then, some jurisdictions have begun to purchase optical-scanning machines, which read paper ballots filled out by voters. The paper ballots are retained to be available in the case of a recount, and could be used to audit the accuracy of the machines. This is precisely what lawmakers intended to have happen, and what voters and election security advocates have demanded from their legislators. And the optical-scanning machines have done more than provide verifiability; one can do the work of many DREs, so they eliminated waiting times for voters where they were used in this past election.

Now, incredibly, committees in the House and Senate are considering a reversal of the ban. SB 988 and HB 2422 would make Virginia the only state to reverse course and embrace a technology that other states have been abandoning. Even Florida, which bought new DREs after the 2000 election debacle, has since scuttled the machines following a second disputed election, and after regulators determined that optical-scan machines would save the state money.

So why would Virginia go backwards? Lawmakers are experiencing a full-court press from local registrars, many of whom never liked the ban and see their chance now to reverse it, while voters aren’t paying attention.

The registrars say they can’t afford to change over all their machines at once, and they don’t want to use DREs in some precincts and optical scan in others. But allowing them to buy more of a bad technology now would simply push the problem down the road. Meanwhile, these officials run the risk of making Virginia the next Florida.

Legislators should not cave into these shortsighted appeals, but should vote no on SB 988 and HB 2422.

 

– Column by Ivy Main

 

Featured Video

AFP

AFP

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora and YouTube. Support AFP by signing up for our newsletter and/or powering our work with a one-time or monthly contribution.

Latest News

police court law
Region

Former Albemarle County Schools employee indicted on nine new sexual battery charges

donald trump money
Trump's America

Trump thinks a $90 payment to Medicare recipients will buy their vote

An AFP reader noticed an unexpected $90 deposit had been made to his bank account on Monday, supposedly from the U.S. Treasury, and worried that someone had hacked the account.

police car
Local

Citizens group wants to get local law enforcement to quit using mobile ALPRs

A citizens group is trying to build momentum toward getting the Augusta County Sheriff’s Office to remove the Axon automatic license plate readers currently in use in ACSO vehicles.

football money
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: How much did we pay for those two guarantee games?

Harrisonburg Fire Station #4
Region

Harrisonburg: City moving forward with plans to replace Fire Station #4

uva basketball
Basketball, Go 'Hoos

UVA Basketball: Women, on heels of Sweet Sixteen run, getting a lot of TV time

armaan franklin
Basketball

UVA Basketball: Catching up with former ‘Hoo Armaan Franklin in Germany