Home Religious freedom at life’s end: An aspiration that’s worth the fight
News and Views

Religious freedom at life’s end: An aspiration that’s worth the fight

AFP

By Kim Callinan

constitution law
(© Daniel Thornberg – stock.adobe.com)

January 16th marks Religious Freedom Day. While people’s spiritual beliefs take on heightened meaning at the end of their life, religious freedom at this time is unfortunately an aspiration, not a reality. A Jan. 4 study in the Journal of American Medical Association, found that an overwhelming 71% of Americans believe that personal decisions about their health should take priority over a healthcare facility’s religious values. Unfortunately, at life’s end, religious institutions often dictate care decisions, regardless of the patient’s preferences.

This harsh reality is particularly true in Catholic health systems, which comprise nearly 80 percent of religious health systems, and whose Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) are among the most restrictive and vigorously enforced when it comes to end of life care.  While many Catholic health systems provide excellent, compassionate care overall, at the end of life they force too many patients to endure care inconsistent with, and many times directly contradictory to, their own values.

In fact, the Catholic ERDs, which are enforced by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, state that if a dying patient’s pain is uncontrollable, a doctor should help their patients “appreciate the Christian understanding of redemptive suffering.” The ERDs also require that medically-assisted nutrition and hydration be provided to patients who can reasonably be expected to live indefinitely if given such care. This includes patients suffering from chronic and irreversible conditions, such as a “persistent vegetative state,” when a person is completely unresponsive and being kept alive by medical intervention only. In contrast, seven out of 10 Americans believe that end-of-life care should instead prioritize “helping people die without pain, discomfort or stress,” according to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey.

While religious entities are allowed to impose their values on patients, they also receive millions of taxpayer dollars. Catholic hospitals and health systems receive nearly $48 billion dollars annually in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, according to a recent report by Community Catalyst. Unfortunately, given the reach and growth of Catholic health care, people often do not have other care options available. According to the Catholic Health Association, U.S. Catholic health care is the nation’s largest group of non-for-profit health care providers, providing patient care for more than 21 million emergency room visits annually. Furthermore, these numbers are climbing: the Community Catalyst report found that Catholic-affiliated hospitals grew by more than 28% over the last two decades. In 52 areas, a Catholic-affiliated hospital is the only care available within a 200+ mile radius.

Even in areas where other care options exist, transparency is lacking: a New York Times analysis of Catholic hospital websites found the majority of Catholic hospitals don’t disclose how their ethical directives impact the care a patient will or won’t be able to receive. In fact, in the majority of cases, it was difficult to even tell that the hospital was Catholic. Also concerning is that many Catholic health systems policies prohibit their doctors from providing information or a referral for end-of-life care options that are inconsistent with their values. This gag rule on doctors leaves patient’s powerless at their time of greatest need.

According to the same Journal of the American Medical Association study I cited earlier, only 6 percent of people consider religious affiliation when deciding their health care provider. If you are among the 71% of Americans who don’t believe that a health system’s policies should dictate the care you receive, I encourage you to ask your local hospitals whether they have religious directives that govern care; if they do, make alternative arrangements if possible.

Kim Callinan is president and CEO of Compassion & Choices, the nation’s oldest, largest, and most active nonprofit working to improve and expand healthcare options for the end of life. Credit to American Forum for sharing this article.

 
 




Featured Video

 

AFP

AFP

Have a guest column, letter to the editor, story idea or a news tip? Email editor Chris Graham at [email protected]. Subscribe to AFP podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora and YouTube. Support AFP by signing up for our newsletter and/or powering our work with a one-time or monthly contribution.

Latest News

uva football tony elliott
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: Still trying to figure out the Tony Elliott buyout terms, if, you know

uva football
Football, Go 'Hoos

UVA Football: First look at Wake Forest, which wants the ‘Hoos in all-orange

Wake Forest and Virginia reportedly had an agreement in the summer to go black (Wake) and orange (Virginia) with their uniform color schemes for their scheduled Saturday, Oct. 31 game.

police court law
Local

How we got here: Summary of U.S. v. Valerie Hayes, the ‘Mennonite kidnapping’ case

In the late hours of July 29, 2018, a young Old Order Mennonite couple were getting ready for bed. The government says that’s when a long, drawn-out plan to kidnap five Old Order children from two respective families and execute their parents came to end.

Staunton fire department house
Local

Staunton: Fire department relocating temporarily due to renovations

tv
Football, Politics

Fox Sports runs America Next TV ad ‘Full of Hate’ on weekend football broadcasts

kymora johnson chance mallory uva basketball
Basketball, Go 'Hoos

UVA Basketball: Kymora Johnson, Chance Mallory named to preseason watch lists

Politics, Sports

MAGA group wants to force VHSL to let homeschool kids try out for high school teams