Wildlife Center president honored

Ed Clark. Photo by Will Kerner

Eagle Rare Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey is today announcing that Ed Clark¸ President and Co-Founder of The Wildlife Center of Virginia in Waynesboro, has received the national 2012 Grand Prize Rare Life Award.

The Rare Life Award is given to an individual who “leads a rare life” of courage, leadership, survival, devotion, character, and heroism.  Nominations were solicited through the Eagle Rare web-site; individuals could review the biographies of scores of nominees and vote for the most worthy recipients.   According to Eagle Rare, Clark’s nomination received a recording-setting 180,000 supporting votes.

Seven finalists were selected from the top 20 vote-recipients.  Clark is the Grand Prize award winner for 2012; as part of the Grand Prize award, Eagle Rare will donate $20,000 to the Wildlife Center. Continue reading “Wildlife Center president honored” »

Wildlife Center treating poisoned bald eagle

On Wednesday, Jan. 11, the Wildlife Center of Virginia admitted a bald eagle – an adult bird – from Prince William County.  The bird was picked up on Jan. 10 near Route 234 (between Manassas and Dumfries) and taken to the Village Veterinary Clinic in Burke.  On Jan. 11, a volunteer transporter picked up the eagle and brought it to the Wildlife Center in Waynesboro.

Upon admission, the bald eagle was thin and showing classic symptoms of lead toxicity.  A blood test confirmed that the bird was suffering from lead toxicity – at levels too high for the Center’s lead analyzer to read.

The Center’s lead-tester reads levels up to 0.65 parts per million. Studies have shown that lead levels of more than 1 ppm are lethal or linked with damage or destruction of the optic nerves. Continue reading “Wildlife Center treating poisoned bald eagle” »

Chase Community Giving and the Wildlife Center of Virginia

Chase Community Giving is a philanthropic effort held by JPMorgan Chase in which charity projects will receive money in accordance to votes by the public on Facebook. The staff at the Wildlife Center of Virginia in Waynesboro is encouraging friends, community members, and supporters to cast a vote for the Wildlife Center.

Voting is now under way, and ends on May 25th. The Center is one of only three Virginia organizations in the top 100 – the other two are the Norfolk Botanical Garden and the National Association for Music Education [headquartered in Reston].

This year’s spring program is the third installment of Chase Community Giving. On March 31, Chase announced a two-year, $25 million commitment to the Chase Community Giving program, which allows Facebook’s 500 million-plus users to choose from hundreds of thousands of charities and vote for them to win grants from Chase. More than 2.7 million Facebook users have “Liked” the Chase Community Giving page. Eligible charities included 501 (c)(3) charities with an operating budget from $1 million to $10 million.

Chase is giving out a total of $5 million through two rounds of online voting. In Round I, Chase gave $25,000 to 100 charities nationwide, based on votes cast through Facebook. The Virginia Wildlife Center was one of those 100 recipients – in fact, the center finished in the top 10 in the final nationwide voting.

In Round 2, these 100 organizations had the option to submit a “Big Idea” in 1,000 characters or less describing how they would use $500,000 to further its cause. Come charities also submitted a 30-second video and five photos demonstrating their “Big Idea.” Since May 19, Facebook users have been voting again to select the best ideas among the top 100 charities. The 25 charities that receive the most votes will receive between $20,000 and $500,000. The winners of Round 2 will be announced on May 26. The top vote-getter will receive $500,000; #2 receiving $400,000, et cetera.

A grant of $100,000, or $250,000, or $500,000 would make a world of difference to the Center. With that money the Center would improve housing for wildlife patients, build a new fly pen for eagles, hawks, and owls, a new area for baby birds, a waterfowl pen and more. Second, the Center would set up an online webcam network to share the activities of the animals with friends around the world. The wild animal patients will be on webcams that will give people the chance to watch eagles being prepared for release or bear cubs recovering from injuries, or turtles just being turtles.

Also with the $500,000, the Center would purchase much needed medical equipment to help the vets save even more lives. There will be new lighting for the surgical unit, a heated surgery table, a water tank for treating oiled and injured waterfowl and more.

Additional information is posted on the Wildlife Center’s website www.wildlifecenter.org/wp/2011/05/chase-community-giving/, including a video with Buddy [a Bald Eagle], a cartoon video about the Chase project, and a summary of how they would use the funds.

For more information on the Chase Community program, or to “like” the page and vote for the Wildlife Center, visit http://apps.facebook.com/chasecommunitygiving/.

Story by Suzi Foltz

Ruby wins disputed Wildlife Center vote

And the winner is … well, more on that in a minute.

The big news with the online poll to name the newest environmental ambassador at the Wildlife Center of Virginia in Waynesboro is that the effort was apparently hacked.

The votes – the legitimate ones, at least – eventually came down in favor of Ruby the Red-Tail. Ruby, a red-tailed hawk hit by a car in Dayton in February 2010, cannot return to the wild due to the severity of her injuries, and will travel with Wildlife Center staff to schools, libraries, and other public events and help share the steps that each of us can take to protect wildlife and the environment.

The Center in January asked local elementary schools to suggest a name, and came up with a list of 174 names that were later winnowed down to a final five. The polls opened online on Feb. 2 to pick the winner, but were closed on Feb. 19 after Center staff noticed irregularities, specifically robo-voting that cast more than 5,000 votes for the name Phoenix from a single overseas Internet service provider, including 3,021 in a six-hour period between midnight and 6 a.m. the morning of Feb. 19.

The purpose of the Center’s online contest was to seek the public’s views on the suggested names, especially from children, not to test computer hacking skills or the ability to rig an election. It’s unfortunate that someone takes pleasure from hacking into, and attempting to spoil, a contest in which so many schoolchildren and others have enjoyed participating,” Wildlife Center president and co-founder Ed Clark said.

Excluding the robo-votes, Ruby led the field with 35.3 percent of the legitimate votes cast, outpacing runner-up Twizzler, which received 25.6 percent.

Phoenix came in fourth with 15.3 percent once the robo-votes were discarded.

“The Wildlife Center is most grateful for the participation of local students and teachers and the more than 4,000 individuals who voted. And our appreciation is not diminished because a couple of people sought to cheat and spoil the contest,” Clark said.

Story by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.

Poll: Help the WIldlife Center name the hawk

The polls are now open in the Wildlife Center of Virginia’s campaign to name a red-tailed hawk – a non-releasable hawk that will soon be visiting schools as one of the Center’s environmental ambassadors.

The Center is taking online votes in this Name-the-Hawk contest through Monday, Feb. 21, and everyone is encouraged to participate. To vote, visit www.wildlifecenter.org/wp/vote-hawk-name.

In January, the Wildlife Center, a leading teaching and research wildlife hospital located in Waynesboro, contacted 39 area elementary schools to ask students to provide suggestions for a name for the red-tailed hawk (the schools are in Augusta and Rockingham Counties and in Harrisonburg, Staunton, and Waynesboro). Students from 21 schools suggested more than 170 names, and five were chosen for the contest:

  • Cherry Tail, suggested by Samantha Glick, a third-grader in Mrs. Rainey’s class at McSwain Elementary in Staunton. “A cherry on the stem reminded me of the hawk’s one eye. That’s what made me think of Cherry Tail,” said Glick.
  • Phoenix, suggested by Mrs. Fulk’s fourth-grade class at Peak View Elementary (Penn Laird). “We thought of Harry Potter and Professor Dumbledore’s pet bird that rose from the ashes and saves people in need,” the class said in its suggestion.
  • Poppy, suggested by Andrew Winfield, a fourth-grader in Mrs. Heizer’s class in Stuarts Draft Elementary. “Because poppies are red, and she is a red-tailed hawk.”
  • Ruby¸ suggested by Mrs. Phelps’ first-grade class at South River Elementary (Grottoes). “We are currently studying Ruby Bridges. The kids thought since Ruby was a brave girl who fought to have a better life and since rubies are red, this would be a good name for a female red-tailed-hawk who also fought for her life.”
  • Twizzler, suggested by Vinny Leo, a fourth-grader in Mrs. Quick’s class at Hugh K. Cassell Elementary (Augusta County). “Vinny’s idea is that Twizzlers are red, like the hawk’s tail.”

In addition to bragging rights, the school that suggested the winning name will receive a special visit from the hawk and Center staff.

The hawk was hit by a car in Dayton in February 2010 and admitted as a patient to the Wildlife Center – one of 45 red-tailed hawks treated at the Center during 2010. Upon admission, the Center’s veterinary team found a fracture in her left wing as well as severe trauma to her right eye. While her wing healed, her eye had to be surgically removed. With limited vision, the bird cannot see well enough to be released into the wild. Since May 2010, Center staff have been working with the hawk to determine her suitability as an education ambassador – a bird that would accompany Center staff on trips to schools, county fairs, and other public events.

At the Wildlife Center, patients are assigned numbers, but education animals are given names.

“Our education animals help students better understand our state’s wildlife and the steps each of us can take to protect wildlife and the environment,” said Amanda Nicholson, the Center’s director of outreach. “It’s such a treat for students to get to see a hawk or an owl or an opossum up close. We’re delighted that area students and the general public will help us name this hawk, who will become another special teacher at the Wildlife Center.”

Edited by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.

Help the Wildlife Center name its new hawk

The Wildlife Center of Virginia, a leading teaching and research hospital for wildlife, is enlisting the help of area elementary-school children in coming up with a name for a Red-tailed Hawk – an non-releasable hawk that will soon be visiting schools as one of the Center’s environmental ambassadors.

Earlier this month, the Wildlife Center contacted 39 area elementary schools to ask students to provide suggestions for a name for the Red-tailed Hawk [the schools are in Augusta and Rockingham Counties and in Harrisonburg, Staunton, and Waynesboro]. The hawk was hit by a car in Dayton, Virginia in February 2010 and admitted as a patient to the Wildlife Center. Upon admission, the Center’s veterinary team found a fracture in her left wing as well as severe trauma to her right eye. While her wing healed, her eye had to be surgically removed. With limited vision, the bird cannot see well enough to be released into the wild. Since May 2010, Center staff have been working with the hawk to determine her suitability as an education ambassador – a bird that would accompany Center staff on trips to schools, county fairs, and other public events.

At the Wildlife Center, patients are assigned numbers, but education animals (permanent residents) are given names. Thus far the Center has received several dozen entries from about 15 schools; the deadline for submission is January 31.

At the end of the month, Center staff will review the names suggested and winnow the list down to a few top choices. Those names will be posted on the Center’s website, and the winner will be determined by an on-line vote.

In addition to bragging rights, the winning school will also received a special visit from the hawk and Center staff.

“Our education animals help students better understand our state’s wildlife and the steps each of us can take to protect wildlife and the environment,” Amanda Nicholson, the Center’s director of outreach, said. “It’s such a treat for students to get to see a hawk or an owl or an opossum up close. We’re delighted that area students will help us name this hawk, who will become another special ‘teacher’ at the Wildlife Center.”

Additional information about the Red-tailed Hawk and this naming contest is available on the Center’s website at www.wildlifecenter.org.

The newly named hawk will join about two dozen hawks, owls, eagles, falcons, turtles and snakes that are part of the Center’s corps of education animals (permanent residents that, because of injuries or behavioral modifications, cannot be released back to the wild).

Other current members of this team of ambassadors are Scarlette (another Red-tailed Hawk); Junior (a Golden Eagle); Edie (an American Kestrel); and Wilson (an Eastern Box Turtle).

Edited by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.

Wildlife expert: Extent of impacts of Gulf spill will never be known

Backing a recently released final report on the 2010 BP oil spill, a local wildlife expert said it is likely that the oil company responsible for the 208 million-gallon spill into the Gulf of Mexico will likely get away with paying for little or none of the damage, and that the federal government’s efforts to focus on managing what the public and press could see will make it hard to prevent future spills.

“I worry that the extent of the impacts will never be known. The government has released their figures on wildlife damage, pointing out that more than 8,000 birds, turtles, and other species ‘were recovered’ during the spill. They want us to believe that this is the full extent of the damage, but that is utterly ridiculous. Any reasonable review of the situation shows just how ridiculous it is,” said Ed Clark, the president of the Waynesboro-based Wildlife Center of Virginia, who traveled to the Gulf in June as part of a team that was there to examine the impact on wildlife.

What he found were “overt government and industry efforts to keep our team, the media, and the public as far away from the impact areas as possible. They seemed to be much more concerned about preventing us from seeing the extent of the damage than about cleaning it up or limiting the environmental impacts,” Clark said.

“I am incredulous that tens of thousands of animals died because the federal government seemed to be more concerned about controlling the press and limiting public scrutiny than about locating and recovering the countless wild creatures that were affected by this disaster. Unfortunately, the commission report fails to even mention this issue, except in the most oblique ways,” Clark said.

The bipartisan commission appointed by President Barack Obama concluded that the entire system of oversight and regulation of offshore oil exploration and development was largely ineffective, and that unless the government and the industry dramatically restructure and redirect their efforts to protect workers’ safety and the environment, a repeat of such a disaster is not only possible, but probable.

Clark criticized the report for failing to address what he calls “the shamefully inadequate response of the federal government to the plight of oiled wildlife.”

“We have lost an opportunity to study the wildlife and fisheries impacts of a spill, as it is happening,” Clark said. “The federal government’s cloak of secrecy meant that scientists and researchers could not get to most of those oiled animals in a timely manner; there was no way to collect samples, conduct studies, or learn about the effects of this oil on the birds, reptiles, fish, and other living creatures of the region. These untold thousands of animals have simply died in vain. It just breaks my heart to think about it.”

Read Ed Clark’s full statement on the commission report here.

Story by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.

Busy 2010 at the Wildlife Center

The Wildlife Center of Virginia, an internationally acclaimed teaching and research hospital for wildlife and conservation medicine located in Waynesboro, admitted a total of 2,303 animals for treatment during 2010 – injured, ailing, and orphaned wildlife from all across Virginia.

During 2010, the Center treated:

  • 1037 mammals, including 299 Eastern Cottontail Rabbits; 223 Eastern Gray Squirrels; and 205 Virginia Opossums. The Center also treated five different species of bats;
  • 122 reptiles and amphibians, including six different species of turtles and six different species of snakes;
  • 247 raptors [birds of prey], including 57 Eastern Screech-Owls;
  • 636 passerines [perching birds], including 161 American Robins;
  • 261 other birds, including 63 Mourning Doves.

Among the “notable” cases of 2010 were:

  • Two Bald Eagles that were hit by planes [one at Dulles, one at Newport News], three that were likely struck by cars, and five that showed signs of lead poisoning;
  • An American Alligator discovered during a drug raid in Staunton;
  • An Eastern Painted Turtle that had swallowed a fish hook, and an Eastern Ratsnake that swallowed a wooden egg;
  • The Ruby-throated Hummingbird coated in pine sap, and the Rock Pigeon covered in oil; and
  • Patients admitted from 86 counties and municipalities from all over the Commonwealth, including a Canada Goose from the City of Arlington, a Gray Squirrel from Frederick County, an Eastern Screech-Owl from Buchanan County, a Peregrine Falcon from the City of Chesapeake – and a tiny Northern Ring-necked Snake rescued from the Center’s library.

During 2010, Center veterinarians treated more than 125 different species of animals. The busiest months were May, with 498 patients admitted, and June [484 patients admitted]. The busiest single day was June 28, with 36 patients admitted.

Most animals are brought to the Center by concerned citizens; others are brought in by animal control officers, other federal, state, and local officials, from humane societies, etc.

During 2010, a total of 242 animals – or one in 10 cases – were brought to the Center after they were attacked by free-roaming cats. Birds and other animals that survive an initial cat attack are still in danger; unless treated, infections from the toxic bacteria found in a cat’s mouth kill a significant number of animals.

During 2010, another 215 patients were classified as “kidnap” victims – a young animal brought to the Center that, in fact, needed no help from humans. These are animals still receiving care from their parents, or young animals ready to live on their own. “Despite our natural inclinations, the BEST chance of survival for a young uninjured animal is often to leave it in its parents’ care,” said Ed Clark, President and Co-founder of the Wildlife Center of Virginia.

Center staff work with citizens who find young animals to assess whether these animals really do need human intervention. [The Center’s website – www.wildlifecenter.org – includes a special "I Need Rescue Advice" section to help citizens assess the health-care needs of animals.] “The Center encourages those who care about wildlife to ask questions FIRST about the most appropriate course of action,” Clark added. The Center’s front desk is staffed seven days a week from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; one of the Center’s veterinarians is on call 24 hours a day.

Since its founding in 1982, the nonprofit Wildlife Center has cared for more than 56,000 wild animals, representing 200 species of birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians.

The goal of the Center is to “treat to release” – to restore patients to health and return as many as possible to the wild. The Center provides state-of-the-art medical care for the sick and injured, and sustained, quality foster care so that animals may be returned to the wild with the ability to survive, and thrive, in their native habitats.

The Center trains veterinary and conservation professionals from all over the world, and wildlife rehabilitators across Virginia, and is actively involved in comprehensive wildlife health studies and the surveillance of emerging diseases.

Edited by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.

Go inside the Wildlife Center

The Wildlife Center of Virginia, located in Waynesboro, is hosting an open house on Sunday, Oct. 17. The times available for the tour of the Wildlife Center are 12:30 p.m., 2 p.m., and 3:30 p.m. Reservations are available for groups up to five.

The Wildlife Center of Virginia is an animal hospital that is known throughout the nation as one of the top teaching and research animal hospitals. The Center has represented over 30 countries with its volunteers and interns.

Opening in 1982, the Center treated five animals that first year; now 28 years later, the animal hospital treats about 3,000 patients each year. The patients come from people who have found injured animals, whether it be along the road or in their backyards, and bring them to the Center, where they can be properly treated and potentially released back into the wild.

This is a nonprofit organization that gets most of its funding through donations. The majority of the food for the animals was donated from various grocery stores.

“We go down to Kroger a couple times a week to get the produce that is almost bad, bring it here and feed it to the animals,” says Jeff Nicholson, who served as a tour guide on a recent tour of the Center. “I have spent a lot of time here in the kitchen on Christmas Eve preparing the animals’ Christmas dinner,” joked Nicholson.

The tour begins with a brief video and introduction of the Wildlife Center, then you begin the actual walk around of the entire center. The animals you are sure to encounter on your visit are all kinds of owls and even a couple different types of eagles. The outside housing for the animals were also made possible through donations; some were made by an Eagle Scout troop. After checking out the outside section, you will walk through the veterinary wing which is where they do exams and operations on the animals.

Upon arrival, the animals go through an exam to see what is wrong with them, then they get the treatment they need in order to make a recovery. Being released back into the wild is something every vet hopes for when the animals are brought in.

The animals go through tests to see if they are actually capable of surviving back in the wild, one test being “Mouse School.” For the birds who are well on their way to recovery and in the outside section, Mouse School is a test they must pass. A mouse is placed in their large cage; in the morning if the mouse is gone, the vets know that the bird is ready to be set free because it can find its own food.

Right now the Wildlife Center has 84 patients. Thirty of them are baby squirrels, and one is a black bear.

To help these animals, funding is necessary. The Center will be hosting 26th annual Gala Benefit and Auction on Saturday, Nov., 6 in Staunton at the Stonewall Jackson Hotel. This event includes a cocktail reception and dinner as well as live and silent auctions.

The money made from this event will go towards the Wildlife Center to continue helping needy animals.
 
 

Story by Jenny Hypes. Jenny can be reached at jenny.hypes@emu.edu.

Feds to Wildlife Center: Thanks, but no thanks

Story by Chris Graham
freepress2@ntelos.net
 

Ed Clark has been in the wildlife business long enough to remember when his help was wanted after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill. The deskbound experts running the show in the wake of the still-ongoing spill in the Gulf of Mexico have made it clear that they think they have the situation covered.

“There are some really profound questions about what’s going on, and the agencies are saying, We’ve got this under control, we have our people there,” said Clark, the president of the Waynesboro-based Wildlife Center of Virginia, back from a frustrating six-day tour of the Gulf.

The chief frustration for Clark: “The people in charge of this response are making a concerted effort to ban any access of any nongovernmental employees to the area.”

“We have more experience and expertise in handling wildlife in distress than practically anyone. Some of the people involved with the government agencies are experts, but they’re deskbound experts. We deal with handling and capturing and restraining wild animals every single day, and yet we have been told that we are not welcome, our help is not needed, and we’ll be banned from the area unequivocally if we show up,” Clark said. Continue reading “Feds to Wildlife Center: Thanks, but no thanks” »

Wildlife Center: ‘We’re not exactly all that touristy’

Story by Chris Graham
freepress2@ntelos.net
 

If you’d ask a person on the street what the Wildlife Center of Virginia does, “the two things they’re likely to say are take care of hurt animals and put on programs for kids. And while all of that is true, it’s like what you see of an iceberg is the 10 percent that sticks above the water line,” said Ed Clark, the founding president of the Waynesboro-based Wildlife Center.

It’s what’s below the water line that drives the work at the Wildlife Center, world-renowned for its work in wildlife and conservation medicine.

Which is to say, “we’re not exactly all that touristy,” said Clark, responding to a suggestion in a recent editorial in The News Virginian that suggested that the Wildlife Center should consider a move to the new Mill at South River development that is in the genesis stages in Downtown Waynesboro. Continue reading “Wildlife Center: ‘We’re not exactly all that touristy’” »

Wildlife Center to play role in post-spill Gulf

Story by Chris Graham
freepress2@ntelos.net
 

They’ve got plenty of people down on the Gulf Coast washing oil off birds. Ed Clark is focusing his attention at the Wildlife Center of Virginia on ecosystem issues.

“We don’t need to go down there and wash birds. They’re already well cared for by the professional groups. What we’re working on is the evaluation of what might be the long-term implications for wildlife, not only in that region, but since migratory birds come through that ecosystem, it might eventually mean that water fowl in Virginia have health effects that originate with the oil spill. Or it could be eagles eating fish that died from oil contamination that floated up to the surface, since eagles are scavengers. What might that oil do to those eagles? The implications of this are enormous, and there really aren’t any good mechanisms in place to follow up on them,” said Clark on Thursday. Continue reading “Wildlife Center to play role in post-spill Gulf” »