Study: No health risks for private liquor sales

A new study from the Virginia Institute for Public Policy finds that privatizing Virginia’s ABC stores will have no effect on the number of alcohol-related health problems in the Commonwealth.

The study, “Impaired Judgment: The Failure of Control States to Reduce Alcohol-Related Problems,” coauthored by George Mason economics professor Don Boudreaux and Julia Williams of Regulatory Economics Group LLC, surveys health data from the 18 “control” states, which, like Virginia, maintain state monopolies over either the retailing or wholesaling of spirits, and the 32 “license” states and the District of Columbia where private retailers sell packaged spirits in competitive markets.

The authors state that these different approaches “offer a natural experiment” to test the claims of those who insist that government-spirits monopolies provide public health-benefits.

Among the reports key findings:

· On alcohol-related deaths: Government-monopoly control of spirits does not reduce citizens’ risks of dying from alcohol-related causes.

On binge drinking: Government monopolies do not protect against the menace of binge drinking.

· On drunk driving fatalities: “…it cannot be said with any confidence that a decrease or increase in such fatalities is attributed to whether a state is a control state or license state.”

· On beer and wine: Any impact that government monopolies might have on spirits consumption can easily be off-set by increased consumption in beer and wine – products that are readily available in control states.

· On reducing abusive drinking: Changing the amount of alcohol consumed by abusive drinkers cannot be done with the kinds of restrictive policies and high taxes that are the basis of the control-state system.

The authors conclude that any health benefits from state control of spirits are “illusory,” and “the plain fact seems to be that alcohol-related problems are unrelated to whether or not a state government prevents private, competitive retailers from selling packaged spirits to the general public.”

The full study may be accessed online: www.VirginiaInstitute.org.
 
 

Edited by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.

Misdirecting charity by perpetuating the myth of widespread hunger in America

  
Column by Donald J. Boudreaux
Submit guest columns: freepress2@ntelos.net

Macy’s lately has taken to displaying in many of its stores a poster claiming that the number of Americans at risk of hunger is one in eight. That’s 12.5 percent of the population. Macy’s hope is that its posters will prompt its customers – who clearly aren’t starving, lest they’d not be shopping for new clothing and kitchen appliances – to contribute to charities that help to feed the alleged 38 million or so Americans who cannot afford to feed themselves.

Desire to help others is noble. It’s noble, though, not in and of itself. It’s noble only if it’s likely to lead to helping others who truly need help. A desire to help others that prompts well-meaning people to address nonexistent problems isn’t so much noble as it is misguided and, possibly, dangerous. Read more

Profit motive is necessary for quality health care

 
Column by Donald J. Boudreaux
Submit guest columns: freepress2@ntelos.net

Not long ago my wife, Karol, and I flew from Bucharest to New York City’s JFK airport. We had two hours to connect to our flight to Washington’s Dulles airport. We missed our flight, and herein lies a lesson about today’s raging debate over government’s proper role in health-care markets.

Part of the reason we missed our flight is that, after landing on time at JFK, our plane sat for more than 30 minutes on the tarmac waiting for another jet to clear away from our gate. JFK International Airport is owned by government (the City of New York) and operated, under lease, by a government agency (the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey). Unlike Delta Airlines, the privately-owned and operated carrier that flew us comfortably, safely, and in a timely fashion over the 4,800 miles that separate Bucharest from New York, the government bureaucrats in charge of JFK airport seem to be short on an asset they control: airport gate space. Read more

Adam Schaeffer, Chaim Katz | Getting politics out of schools improves children’s learning

Everyone’s still catching their breath from last year’s election season. However, all the nastiness is sure to fire up again now that Barack Obama has been sworn in. In fact, some of the inaugural season’s heat was generated when Obama announced that evangelical pastor Rick Warren would deliver the invocation at the presidential inauguration. Warren opposes gay marriage and many of Obama’s supporters are strong supporters of the drive to legalize gay marriage.  Read more

Donald J. Boudreaux | Pricing roads

Virginia’s roads are congested. And our leaders are tackling the problem – or claiming to do so. Trouble is, too many of the proposals ricocheting around Richmond are small-think. Many politicians think the problem has to be too little money, so they keep demanding higher taxes that, we are assured, the state will use efficiently and wisely to “solve” our transportation needs. Read more

Adam Schaeffer and Chaim Katz | The best gift for kids is a better education

Another Christmas has come and gone, and the New Year is here with the resulting resolutions. Many of us use this time of year to reflect on the spirit of giving, especially in the midst of rising unemployment and uncertainty. Some people had less to give or perhaps nothing at all, or even relied on the giving of others, but many people continued with their charity despite their own increasing hardships. Read more

Tibor Machan | Bailout-mania

It is becoming common practice for governments to intercede with their legal powers whenever politicians believe that private firms need to be bailed out after their imprudent business decisions have lead them to the brink of disaster. Interestingly, such practices are justified by the cheerleaders of government intervention on the grounds that now and then they help. For example, when Chrysler Corporation was near collapse several decades ago, the government advanced money to it, which served to keep the company in business. Chrysler did manage to recover and, in time, pay back what it borrowed. Read more