David Reynolds: The Virginia Plan
Posted by afp on October 4, 2011 · Leave a Comment
How have you been enjoying the 2012 presidential campaign so far? Just as I thought. Here’s more bad news: there are 13 months months left in the campaign. One suggestion: cancel 2012. Tell the Republicans to go ahead and hand four more years to the president. This should be easy. The GOP is very good at blowing presidential elections. (And for the losers the winters are not that bad in Canada.) In exchange, Americans will be so grateful that any 2016 GOP presidential nominee will sweep into office.
Now for what I wanted to say. Let’s start at the beginning. From Alex and Tom to Barack and John, from Hamilton and Jefferson to Obama and Boehner, there have been two grand philosophical highways. Now there are four byways requiring serious repair.
This should please the so-called independent political souls out there who are always wishing for a third major political party. I’ve just raised you one. Yes, my Republican and Democratic friends, splitsville has finally occurred. We have proof: last summer’s debt ceiling soap opera in gridlock DC. There are not only two different visions of America — there are two different ways of doing business.
Here are today’s four major political parties. You should be able to recognize each.
A. The Tax & Spend Party. The Great Depression made this party great. It spoke directly for those unable to speak for themselves. The party ran on a successful fiscal formula of redistribution of income to the lower classes. Then came Vietnam, the 1972 election and social issues. The party spoke from both coasts, but was seldom heard in America’s heartland.
B. The Spend & Tax Party. This new party came into power in 2008. Its timing could not have been worse. The housing bubble burst and the economy collapsed. The party’s strategy was that once the vast middle class enjoyed their new candy store, they would be willing to allow others to pay the tab later. After all, this strategy worked for decades in Europe. Why not in America? Meanwhile the financial crisis depressed growth and tax revenues. The people were not able to pay for their big new candy store, including the health care all day sucker sold to them. Its leader’s honeymoon ended.
C. The Don’t Tax/Don’t Spend Party. This is the party of “No.” Its roots go back to the Libertarian Party and are now spreading with the tea party movement. Its base does not care for today’s big government because it enjoys reading old musty documents, such as the Constitution. Therefore, it will always be out-of-date. They believe that two birds in the bush would have been better than two Bush’s. However, in order to grow and have influence, this party needs to buy a dictionary. In it they will find that “congress” means, “the act or fact of coming together.”
D. The Tax A Little/Spend A Little Party. This is currently the watered-down version of Party “A.” It tends to lose elections because voters are like Coke drinkers, they like “the real thing.” It is the party of “It all depends.” It sees most government programs as evil, but necessary. It has lasted since Lincoln by rationing out its sweets to those only in congressional districts. Then it discovered that everyone lives in a congressional district.
That’s it. Four parties, four speeds: fast; express; stop; and slow . We now know that it doesn’t work in government, politics or in railroading. There’s going to be a train wreck. There almost was.
Here’s my solution, call it “The Virginia Plan.” Go back to doing everything the way we’ve always done it. Tell Mr. Obama that his party is over. It was an exciting four-year run. But too exciting. Tell the tea drinkers to keep the faith, but join up with the GOP. Now dem Dems can return to what they do best: spreading social justice and raising money. The elephant will finally throw its full weight around. It will get smart and run on its ticket the governor of a key swing state and win the election. Governor McDonnell will be happy in his new DC home.
By the way, Bob, it is on Massachusetts Avenue, not Pennsylvania Avenue.
Column by David Reynolds
Filed under Blogs · Tagged with barack obama, bob mcdonnell, david reynolds, president, presidential election
Poll: Obama doubles lead over Perry … is voter concern over Social Security the reason why?
Posted by afp on September 13, 2011 · Leave a Comment
A new Public Policy Polling survey of voters has Barack Obama nearly doubling his lead over Texas Gov. Rick Perry as swing voters begin to express concerns about Perry’s comments on Social Security being a “Ponzi scheme.”
Obama led Perry in the polling by a 52 percent-to-41 percent margin in the recent PPP poll. Three weeks ago, PPP had Obama ahead of Perry by six points, 49 percent to 43 percent.
Inside the numbers, Perry is getting hammered by voters on his controversial views on Social Security. Just 20 percent of voters agree with his view of Social Security being a Ponzi scheme, with 70 percent disagreeing with the statement.
Voters split even more significantly on a related question in the polling on whether the federal government should end Social Security – 82 percent opposed and only 10 percent in favor.
Another interesting tidbit in the numbers: Democrats have moved more solidly in favor of Obama since Perry attained frontrunner status in the GOP field. Three weeks ago, Obama led among Democrats by an 81 percent-to-13 percent margin. This week’s poll has Obama ahead among the base by an 89 percent-to-9 percent tally.
Obama’s lead over Mitt Romney is much narrower in this week’s PPP poll – 49 percent to 45 percent.
Filed under Government/Politics · Tagged with barack obama, mitt romney, president, public policy polling, rick perry
Does Perry help boost Obama?
New polling by Public Policy Polling shows Texas Gov. Rick Perry moving into the frontrunner role for the Republican Party presidential nomination. A benefactor to the Perry surge could be President Barack Obama.
Obama leads Perry in a national PPP poll by a 49 percent-to-43 percent margin. The same polling has Obama tied at 45 percent with the former GOP race frontrunner, Mitt Romney.
“Rick Perry’s momentum in the Republican field is the best thing that’s happened to Barack Obama lately,” said Dean Debnam, president of Public Policy Polling. “The president would have an easier time winning re-election against him than Mitt Romney.”
A key reason: the conservative firebrand Perry fares poorly with independent voters, who view him negatively (29 percent approval, 55 percent disapproval). Obama as a result has a 56 percent-to-32 percent lead over Perry among independents.
The PPP poll had Obama leading Michele Bachmann by eight points (50 percent to 42 percent), Herman Cain by 10 points (49 percent to 39 percent), and Sarah Palin by 13 points (53 percent to 40 percent).
Filed under Government/Politics · Tagged with barack obama, mitt romney, president, public policy polling, rick perry
I Love The ’90s, Part Two
Posted by afp on February 28, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Are we about to reprise the pendulum swings of the Gingrich-Clinton era?
Report by Chris Graham
freepress2@ntelos.net
Might we see a repeat of 1994 in 2010? The short answer: yes. Next question: Might we then see a repeat of 1996 in 2012? Well, maybe.
“For all the trouble Barack Obama’s had lately voters still prefer him to any of the top Republican contenders for 2012,” said Dean Debnam, president of Public Policy Polling, which polled 743 registered voters in February and found the Democrat Obama leading all of the top potential 2012 Republican Party hopefuls at this very, very early stage more than two and a half years out from the November 2012 presidential election.
An Obama win might have to come after a November 2010 switch in majority-party status in at least the House of Representatives, which would mirror the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994 that was followed by the re-election of Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1996.
An analysis from the University of Virginia Center for Politics released last week suggests that Republicans could be poised to gain 37 seats in the ’10 midterms, which would put the GOP within hailing distance of taking majority control of the legislative chamber. A switch of 40 seats from the D column to the R column would give the Republicans the majority in the House. Continue reading “I Love The ’90s, Part Two” »
Filed under Government/Politics · Tagged with barack obama, congress, democratic party, mike huckabee, mitt romney, president, president barack obama, president obama, public policy polling, republican party, sarah palin, university of virginia center for politics, uva. center for politics, white house
Stop the Presses | The GOP’s Palin Quandary
Posted by afp on July 8, 2009 · 9 Comments
Let’s pretend for a minute that I’m a Republican Party strategist. So I’m musing on the news that somehow, some way, Sarah Palin is even more popular among the GOP base now that she’s up and quit her job as governor of Alaska barely halfway through her one term in office, that two-thirds of my faithful want her to continue being a major political figure. Continue reading “Stop the Presses | The GOP’s Palin Quandary” »
Filed under Government/Politics · Tagged with fox news, mike huckabee, mitt romney, newt gingrich, president, sarah palin, white house
My congratulations to the new president
Posted by afp on November 8, 2008 · Leave a Comment
Barack Obama has received the most number of congratulatory messages from everyone. Indeed, he is the very shape of hope not only for the Unites States, but for the entire world as well.
My message will not have the very opportunity to be read by Obama; that I understand and accept. Continue reading “My congratulations to the new president” »
Filed under Government/Politics · Tagged with augusta free press, barack obama, haresh daswani, president

















Bill Clifford: Your vote vs. their money
Posted by afp on January 10, 2012 · Leave a Comment
The problem here is that the voters and the special interests are different groups with different expectations. Voters expect politicians to represent the country and their local district. Special interests expect favors for themselves and their companies. Voters never have enough money to get the attention of members of Congress after the election. Continue reading “Bill Clifford: Your vote vs. their money” »
Filed under Blogs · Tagged with congress, Government/Politics, independent, president, third party