Payday-loan decision involved Valley case
The Virginia Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision issued on April 21, ruled that the widespread practice of payday lenders in Virginia of having a borrower repay a loan and immediately take out a new loan for the same amount, commonplace prior to 2009 statutory amendments, violated Virginia law prohibiting payday lenders from refinancing, renewing, or extending such loans.
The decision was issued in a case brought by Wilma L. Ruby, an elderly Shenandoah County resident, against Cash Advance Centers, a payday lending company that operated a store in Woodstock. She was represented by a local Harrisonburg attorney, Grant Penrod, of the law firm HooverPenrod, on a pro bono basis. Penrod had agreed to represent her without charge after she had sought free legal assistance in dealing with the payday lender from the local legal aid society, Blue Ridge Legal Services.
From March 2005 through November 2007, Ruby took out 33 monthly loans ranging from $200 to $500 from the payday lender. On a fixed monthly income of $624, Ruby couldn’t afford to pay her loan in full and pay her bills, the court decision states. So she would pay off her loan and associated finance charges, take another loan for the same amount from the lender, then repeat the cycle again a month later. By calling each of these transactions a new loan, instead of a refinancing or renewal of an existing loan, the payday lender sought to evade the interest rate ceilings set by state law, and instead imposed interest charges of approximately 190 percent, well in excess of what was allowed even under the Payday Loan Act. The Virginia Supreme Court found that this illegal practice trapped borrowers like Ruby “in a vicious cycle of debt”.
According to Jay Speer, executive director of the Virginia Poverty Law Center in Richmond, there may have been as many as 9 million payday loans issued between 2002 and 2009 in violation of the law as applied by the Virginia Supreme Court.
“We are absolutely thrilled with Grant Penrod’s successful representation of Ms. Ruby, and we are immensely grateful for his generous commitment of his time and talents on her behalf,” said John Whitfield, executive director of Blue Ridge Legal Services. “It is heartening to know that the Virginia Supreme Court sees this predatory lending practice for the unconscionable debt trap that it is.”
A copy of the decision is available from the Virginia Supreme Court’s website, at www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/opnscvwp/1100287.pdf.
In retrospect: Many payday loans were illegal
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled last week that when a payday lender “makes a loan to a borrower immediately after the borrower repays in full a previous loan,” that second loan was made in violation of the 2002 Virginia Payday Loan Act.
An estimated 9.2 million of those type payday loans were made between 2002 and 2009, when a new law passed by the Virginia General Assembly forced payday lenders to wait one day before making a new loan to a borrower. The Supreme Court ruling didn’t address whether loans made the next day could also be considered an unlawful loan refinancing or extension.
“I am pleased that the Virginia Supreme Court recognized that payday lending in Virginia has largely been an illegal scam,” said Jay Speer of the Virginia Poverty Law Center.
Advocates of payday-loan reform feel the high court’s decision should put legislators on notice that the predatory lenders cannot be expected to follow the law when “reform” measures are passed.
“The only way to effectively regulate predatory lending is to return to interest rate caps that worked well before the General Assembly started creating all these exceptions for payday lenders and others,” said Dana Wiggins, coordinator with the Virginia Partnership to Encourage Responsible Lending.
Push on to limit interest rates on payday, car-title loans
Former Gov. Tim Kaine signed a much-trumpeted reform of payday lending in 2008, but loopholes in the industry-written law were quickly exploited by lenders, who have since moved on to other high-interest loan products that have proven to be highly marketable in the midst of the ongoing economic slowdown.
Staunton City Councilman Bruce Elder led a grassroots effort in 2007 and 2008 that helped draw attention to the issue by getting more than 60 local governments to sign on to a resolution calling for the General Assembly to move toward substantive reform. Elder is back at it again, leading a push that has more than 50 localities engaging state lawmakers to pass a hard interest-rate cap on loans.
“A couple of years ago, i think what you saw is that there were still people who thought that the industry had some legitimacy and that they were providing a good service. Now I think you can look back and say that they weren’t negotiating in good faith, that the industry continues to produce a loan product that preys upon people on fixed incomes, people on disability incomes and Social Security incomes, it preys on financial illiteracy in minority communities,” Elder said.
“If we’re looking to rebuild a weakened economy, we have to rebuild it for everybody,” Elder said.
The resolution passed first by Staunton City Council in May has localities asking the General Assembly to impose a 36 percent cap on interest and fees associated with loans. The annual percentage rate on payday loans, car-title loans and related loan products is in the 300 to 400 percent range.
The industry markets its products as being low-cost and hassle-free, attracting consumers who either don’t want to go through credit checks or are afraid that their credit would disqualify them from being able to access more traditional loan sources, said Dana Wiggins, the responsible lending coordinator at the Richmond-based Virginia Poverty Law Center.
“These lenders are on television, on the radio, nearly every hour of the day. They know how to target people. They know how to push those buttons and get people to come to them,” said Wiggins, who notes that it’s not just those on the economic fringes making up the customer base these days.
“With the turn in the economy, more and more middle-class people are seeking out these loans as a quick fix, and they’re realizing how onerous the terms are for these loans. And the people who are more middle class who are calling our hotline – they’re just totally shocked. They think these loans should clearly be illegal,” Wiggins said. “They get the loans, they look at the storefront. They say, There’s a storefront, they’re on a main street in my town. You would think is being condoned by the government because they’re out in the open and not some back alley. But after being in the loan and not being able to pay it off because of how high the interest is, they’re like, How is this even legal? They just really had no idea.”
There’s another impetus for change, then. You have the localities banding together again, as they did in 2007-2008, and now you have a new group of disaffected consumers. “As more people get to understand the industry and how it works, I definitely see a shift in the direction of taking stronger action,” Wiggins said.
The tough part to the effort, said Ward Scull, the cofounder of the Newport News-based Virginians Against Payday Loans, is whether the General Assembly gets it.
“When I got involved in this, I never realized it would take so long to get this squared away in Virginia. Social-reform legislation apparently takes a lot longer than I ever thought it would,” said Scull, a moving-company executive who with retired local-government official Mike Lane launched Virginians Against Payday Loans in 2007.
Scull applauds the efforts of Elder to put pressure on state legislators, and has hopes that the General Assembly will take action to limit interest rates and fees in its 2011 session.
“Hopefully legislators will listen to what their constituents are saying. 2011 is an election year. Hopefully this session they’ll do the right thing for the right reasons,” Scull said.
Story by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.
Fool me once … Will the Loophole Lender Lobbyists get their way again?
Column by Jay Speer
Submit guest columns: freepress2@ntelos.net
It is astonishing that the payday lenders could get caught thumbing their noses at our state legislators last year and now try to claim they have some sort of “right” to do their loophole loans.
The 2008 General Assembly enacted several changes to the Virginia payday loans law that took effect January 1, 2009. But instead of complying with the new law, the payday lenders started doing “line of credit loans” to take advantage of a loophole in Virginia law that allows unrestricted, unregulated open-end loans.
Open-end loans have no set time to be repaid. The borrower just needs to make a minimum payment each month — think “credit cards” (with a 300 percent interest rate). Virginia enacted this open-end credit loophole many years ago in order to attract lending business here but this loophole is no longer necessary. Continue reading “Fool me once … Will the Loophole Lender Lobbyists get their way again?” »
Letters to the Editor
- An open letter to state leaders
- Out of touch
An open letter to state leaders
Submit letters: freepress2@ntelos.net
As a new decade begins, this letter is sent to the leaders of the executive and legislative branches of Virginia government with best wishes for success in addressing the difficult issues facing the state and its citizens in 2010 and beyond. The economy, jobs, education, the budget, and transportation among other issues make up a daunting agenda for Virginia. As witnessed in the nation’s capitol this year, one or two complex and controversial issues can dominate the agenda and divide the parties, resulting in gridlock. With your leadership we believe that Virginia can avoid the problems and pitfalls of the Washington scene and make this legislative session a success for our state and all of its citizens.
In that context, we bring to your attention an issue that has plagued the General Assembly and the state for many years and that is the issue of predatory lending. Unfortunately, Virginia is a state that has been a perennial haven for predatory lending of all stripes including payday, car title, and open-ended lending. By any other name, predatory lending is legalized usury and in practice means annual interest rates of 400% or more along with devious schemes to trap the borrower in a cycle of debt leading to bankruptcy, foreclosures, and financial ruin. Continue reading “Letters to the Editor” »

















Michael Lane: Usury
Posted by afp on June 24, 2010 · Leave a Comment
Submit letters: freepress2@ntelos.net
At times, it seems as if Congress is the most dysfunctional institution in the nation; however, the Virginia General Assembly can give them a run for their money. For several years now the leadership of the General Assembly has been faced with a simple question: Should we ban usury and predatory lending in Virginia or protect it under the guise of the free market economy?
Overwhelmingly citizens, local governments, and civic organizations have called for a simple solution: a 36 percent APR cap on all loans with no fees, and every year the General Assembly has sided with the usurers and predatory lenders. Continue reading “Michael Lane: Usury” »
Filed under Blogs · Tagged with payday lending, payday lending virginia, payday loan virginia, payday loans, virginians against payday lending