Pat Byington: Follow the scientists

Dr. James McClintock, a renowned University of Alabama-Birmingham marine biologist who has conducted research in Antarctica for more than 25 years, told me the following story.

“You work in a scientific lab in the quietest place on Earth — Antarctica.

“There’s a Crack! Boom!

“You rush to the window of your remote lab with a number of your fellow scientists, and you witness a glacier ‘calving’ a chunk of ice the size of a house into the water. Adrenaline permeates the room.

“Ten years ago, that exciting and incredible sight would happen about once a week. It was an event. Something rare.

“Today, at that same lab in Antarctica, the calving glacial ice, the explosive sounds, are a daily occurrence.

“The scientists are almost ‘ho-hum’ about it, barely lifting their heads to recognize the melting ice.”

Such is life in a warming world.

McClintock has spent most of his life searching the ends of the earth for a cure for cancer and other human diseases. In fact, his research team has discovered marine species in the Antarctic that produce compounds active against skin cancer and influenza.

McClintock is not an alarmist. He does not have a political agenda. But he knows firsthand the earth is warming and he understands some of the consequences. Mid-winter temperatures on the Antarctic Peninsula where he works are 10 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than they were 60 years ago. That may not seem like a big difference to us non-scientists, but it’s devastating to a delicate polar ecosystem (and other ecosystems).

In fact, this spring, McClintock and his research associates documented an invasion of king crabs that are likely to endanger fragile Antarctic clams, snails, and brittlestars, or perhaps even the sea squirts that he and his colleagues study that could unlock a cure for skin cancer. This new predator, with its crushing claws, is moving in because of the rapidly warming seas. Once they make their way up onto the Antarctic shelf, an archaic marine ecosystem that has been without crushing predators for millennia will find itself largely defenseless. King crabs could very well destroy McClintock’s living lab. For McClintock, it’s like discovering someone is about to burn down your home and your life’s work and possessions.

I have always believed the National Academies of Science and the National Research Council motto “Where the nation turns for independent and expert advice” accurately portrays that most venerable institution. As a nation, we have been seeking their advice since President Lincoln established this scientific body in 1863. Last month, without much fanfare, and little to no attention from the national media, the National Academies released their latest congressionally requested report on climate change.

The report, “America’s Choices,” does not pull any punches. It reaffirms that climate change is occurring now and that the most effective strategy to combat it would be to begin cutting greenhouse gas emissions immediately.

What makes this report more shocking is the fact that it is not new. As far back as 2005, the National Academies of the U.S., France, Canada, the United Kingdom, India, Italy, Japan, Germany, Brazil and China have jointly called upon policy makers throughout the world to address climate change. The message from the National Academies six years ago was virtually identical to the one in 2011. Climate change is real. We need to drastically reduce greenhouse emissions. We need to aggressively seek technological and scientific solutions. Delaying will only make matters worse.

And now, more than ever, the signs of climate change are becoming starker. The extreme weather and floods in the Midwest and South this spring, historical droughts and fires in Texas and Arizona, permafrost disappearing in Russia/Siberia, floods in Pakistan, massive drought followed by flooding in Australia and whole villages in Alaska disappearing because of sea level rise are just a few recent examples.

The climate is changing so rapidly the Arbor Day Foundation has changed its recommendations for when and where you should plant your trees.

Are we going to follow the National Academy of Sciences and countless scientists’ advice on climate change? Are we going to listen to Dr. James McClintock and try to save a place that can lead to cures for cancer? Or are we going to barely lift our heads and refuse to recognize the climate changing around us?

Pat Byington is publisher of Bama Environmental News (www.bamanews2.blogspot.com). He is a longtime environmental advocate from Birmingham, Alabama who has served on numerous state and national environmental boards.

Groups say UVa. must balance transparency and academic freedom in considering request for professor’s records

Twelve organizations concerned with free speech and the integrity of scientific inquiry on college campuses today asked the University of Virginia to protect academic freedom when it answers a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the American Tradition Institute Environmental Law Center and Robert Marshall, a member of the Virginia House of Delegates.

The FOIA request, which seeks emails and other communications related to UVA Professor Michael Mann’s research on global warming, resembles the controversial civil investigative demand, or CID, issued last year by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli under the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. Concerned that complying with the CID would chill academic freedom, UVA took the matter to Albemarle County Circuit Court, which quashed the CID.

“As citizens, we have an abiding interest in protecting both academic freedom and open government,” said ACLU of Virginia Executive Director, “but sometimes these two principles come in conflict with each other. For most government workings, we should know just about everything that happens, but when FOIA inquiries run the risk of chilling the free exchange of ideas, we need to carve out some narrow exceptions.”

In their letter, the twelve signatories note that the Virginia FOIA already exempts certain records related to scientific research that have “not been publicly released, published, copyrighted or patented.” The letter asks the university to be mindful of that exemption and academic freedom concerns when responding to the FOIA request.

The ACLU of Virginia, AAUP, UCS and the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression recently teamed up to file an amicus brief in the Cuccinelli/CID case, siding with the University of Virginia. After the Albemarle County Court ruled in UVA’s favor, the attorney general appealed the case to the Virginia Supreme Court, which has not yet ruled.

A copy of today’s letter is available at www.acluva.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/20110414LettertoUVAMannFOIA.pdf

Signatories to the letter are: ACLU of Virginia, Alliance for Justice, American Association of University Professors, Center for Inquiry, Climate Science Watch, Council of Environmental Deans and Directors, National Coalition Against Censorship, National Council for Science and the Environment, People For the American Way, The Ornithological Council, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Robert M. O’Neil, Director of the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression.

Kathleen Rogers: Women’s equality and the climate change challenge

On Aug. 26, we commemorate Women’s Equality Day and reflect on the true meaning of equality. The day is important, not just to evaluate where women are in terms of representation and equal pay for equal work, but also to consider the ramifications of what would happen should half of the world’s population be left out of decision-making – particularly in the dialogue that will shape our collective future, the dialogue on climate change, the green economy and sustainability.

Our leaders and the world’s heads of state have failed to solve the climate crisis or to shift into a green economy – all while everyone knows that the path we tread will exhaust the world’s food, water and energy. Public opinion strongly favors action; nonetheless, progress is stalled.

It’s no coincidence that female participation is dismal in the U.N.’s climate negotiations, in the halls of our government and in corporate board meetings. Meanwhile, climate change is disproportionately affecting women. Heat and extreme weather already impede the work that falls on women worldwide, e.g. collecting water and growing crops. Not only are women responsible for as much as 80 percent of farming in the developing world, they’re much more vulnerable to natural disasters than men.

But women need not be victims of the climate crisis. A new generation of women entrepreneurs, leaders and artists, have demonstrated the potential for being the solution to the climate crisis – yes, imagine that. But they must be mobilized and given an opportunity to influence government and business.

An influx of female leadership might solve the climate crisis. Studies have shown that successful female entrepreneurs take different risks than their male counterparts. Female entrepreneurs risk their own personal capital – their time, their finances. Male risk-taking, on the other hand, seems to involve the wealth of others. Just look at the recent financial crisis and the mostly male Wall Street bankers who invented bizarre investment products in testosterone-fueled high-rises.

Politically powerful women in the U.S. and abroad want to find solutions to the climate-change dilemma. They want to champion women’s roles in establishing a green economy. From Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, who created a new office for women at the State Department, to Amina Benkhadra, Morocco’s Minister of Energy, Mines, Water and Environment, to Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the U.N. framework on Climate Change, women are beginning to play key roles in the climate and renewable-energy discussion. They’re making their voices heard.

Investing in the strength of women seems to be a no-brainer, especially in these difficult times. We must invest in this level-headed and hard-working half of the population while raising our collective female voices, because women exemplify fresh perspectives, long-term considerations and sane risk-taking.

Our leadership must include more female entrepreneurs who consider long-term costs while honoring debts to lenders and to future generations. Did you know that women are less likely to file for bankruptcy, or that the most successful micro lending projects in the developing world are those that loan exclusively to women?

In 1992, as the global community gathered at the first U.N. Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, it agreed to a set of principles on sustainable development. One of these principles was that: “Women have a vital role in environmental management. … Their full participation is therefore essential.” Almost 20 years later, we have yet to see that full participation. Why the slow-going? Before the Rio Earth Summit of 2012, we’d like to change that.

What we need to do is to convene female leaders to re-examine the climate crisis through a different lens. These leaders would then mobilize women all over the world to promote innovative solutions, all while promoting participation of women in green technology. This effort would include women political and business leaders, as well as top minds from the creative world.

Our leaders’ approach to climate change has brought no progress. We need fresh ideas, and we need new leadership; we need a different perspective. As we shift into a new green economic model, we need women to be front and center as entrepreneurs and technical workers. And, with targeted training, education and mentorship, we can make the girls of today leaders of the new green economy of tomorrow. When it comes to the world’s future, we can’t afford to take risks with the wealth of others nor the wealth and wellbeing of future generations.
 
 

Kathleen Rogers is the president of Earth Day Network.

A hidden truth about climate change

  
Column by Riane Eisler
Submit guest columns, letters: freepress2@ntelos.net

The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference makes evident potential catastrophic effects of climate change, including its enormous economic and human tolls. It also clearly shows how poor nations in Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America and island states will suffer most from the inevitable floods, droughts and other weather disasters.

But there’s more that needs to be made clear in Copenhagen. If we look closely, there’s a hidden truth with huge implications that we must bring to the attention of conference delegates to ensure that allocated funds actually protect those most vulnerable to these natural disasters. Continue reading “A hidden truth about climate change” »

Global warming – or just hot air?

 
Column by Edward R. Long, Ph.D.
Columns, letters:
freepress2@ntelos.net

On Nov. 19 a message was provided on the World Wide Web that 168 megabites of e-mail correspondence, computer code, and documents from the computers of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (UEA’s CRU) were being released. The initial take was this had been done by a hacker. More recent news documents that a portion of the files had been sent to the BBC a month earlier (ref-1) and that the release may have been from a whistle blower. Continue reading “Global warming – or just hot air?” »

Planet’s future depends on Copenhagen

 
Column by Sarah van Gelder
Columns, letters:
freepress2@ntelos.net

As the Copenhagen Climate Summit approaches, some world leaders predict there will be either no deal or one so weak that it will be virtually worthless.

Little wonder. Climate change could be one of the toughest issues the world has ever faced, less because of the technical challenges than the politics. That’s why the growing climate movement is so important to watch. Its success could determine if world leaders feel enough heat to take action. Continue reading “Planet’s future depends on Copenhagen” »

Earth Talk | A new Ice Age?

Dear EarthTalk: It has been said that global warming will bring a new ice age. Is this true or only fiction?
|- Nitisha Jain, Delhi, India

While no one can be sure what and how severe the effects of global warming will be, it is entirely possible that one outcome of our profligate use of fossil fuels could be an ice age. The theory goes that a warming-induced influx of cold, fresh water into the North Atlantic from melting polar ice caps and glaciers could shut down the Gulf Stream, an underwater channel of warm ocean water that winds its way north from the Caribbean and moderates temperatures in the northeastern U.S. and Western Europe. Continue reading “Earth Talk | A new Ice Age?” »

Earth Talk | China and global warming

Dear EarthTalk: Has China been making any progress reducing its output of global warming gases, and/or in tackling other environmental problems?
–Bill W., Saugus, Mass.

Decades of rapid-fire development and lack of government oversight has meant that China now faces some serious environmental challenges. According to research by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, China surpassed the United States as the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases in 2006—and hasn’t looked back. (While the Chinese emit some eight percent more carbon dioxide than their American counterparts, the U.S. still leads the world in greenhouse gas emissions per capita, due to its significantly smaller population size and higher standard of living.) Continue reading “Earth Talk | China and global warming” »

Group thanks members of Congress for vote on climate bill

American Values Network has launched a local pastor thank-you campaign thanking Members of Congress who voted in favor of the House climate bill. The campaign is a continuation of American Value Network’s half a million-dollar media campaign built upon faith and military leaders coming together to highlight the moral and national security implications of climate change. Continue reading “Group thanks members of Congress for vote on climate bill” »

Earth Talk | Population and warming

Dear EarthTalk: To what extent does human population growth impact global warming, and what can be done about it?
- Larry LeDoux, Honolulu, Hawaii

No doubt human population growth is a major contributor to global warming, given that humans use fossil fuels to power their increasingly mechanized lifestyles. More people means more demand for oil, gas, coal and other fuels mined or drilled from below the Earth’s surface that, when burned, spew enough carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere to trap warm air inside like a greenhouse. Continue reading “Earth Talk | Population and warming” »

Edward R. Long | Global warming – man, or nature?

Both the new president and both sides of the aisle in the new Congress have been politically convinced, or see an opportunity for a government power play, that man’s carbon-dioxide emissions are the cause of global warming. But is man really responsible? More than 30,000 American scientists and engineers do not think man is the cause. More and more leaders in England and other parts of the English-speaking world are beginning to think not. The new head of the European Union is in doubt. Continue reading “Edward R. Long | Global warming – man, or nature?” »

Today’s Winner | Global warming makes a comeback

It was in the 50s here in the Valley today. Which must be proof that global warming is making a comeback. Since that snowstorm a couple of weeks ago in Las Vegas was proof that global warming is a hoax.