Saxman on lifting of bottled-water ban: ‘There’s just no story here’
A report on a website for a Norfolk TV station last week brought back to life a summertime story on the lifting of a ban on the purchase of bottled water by the state by Gov. Bob McDonnell – and seemed to suggest that the move was done to benefit a Staunton-based water company whose general manager, former state delegate Chris Saxman, is a political ally of the governor.
This much is true: The governor did lift the ban, Shenandoah Valley Water Co. does get the bulk of the state’s bottled-water business, but the dollar value on the deal is relatively miniscule, and the bottler won the contract through a competitive bid process.
“Without any foundation in fact whatsoever, they just through this innuendo out there. Ooh, the mere appearance of impropriety. Well, we did a lot of business with the state when Mark Warner was governor, when Tim Kaine was governor. We’ve been doing business with the state since Chuck Robb was governor,” Saxman told AugustaFreePress.com. “It’s shoddy journalism that tries to create the appearance of impropriety, that we’ll take this long, in-depth look at potential corruption in politics. What’s corrupt about doing a state bid? The insinuation is that a political contribution to Bob’s campaign is going to have some sort of sway over people who wouldn’t even know that I know Bob McDonnell. That’s ludicrous.”
A report by the Boston-based Corporate Accountability International put the value of Shenandoah Valley Water Co.’s dealings with the state in fiscal year 2009 at $101,000. The state spent $158,000 on bottled water in the ’09 fiscal year, according to a separate report in the Washington Post.
McDonnell’s predecessor as governor, Tim Kaine, instituted the ban on bottled-water purchases by the state in 2009 as part of an overall conservation plan. McDonnell lifted the ban in July, citing the increased flexibility that move would give to state agencies and the impact that the ban could have on the bottled-water industry.
“Gov. McDonnell is committed to putting in place policies that advance and aid the growth of Virginia industries,” McDonnell spokesperson Stacey Johnson said in a statemetn e-mailed to AugustaFreePress.com in response to our query on the topic this week. “The bottled-water industry employs thousands of Virginians, and a state ban on the purchase of this product would unfairly penalize those workers, and negatively impact these businesses in a very tough economy. Lifting this one-year-old ban simply allows state agencies more flexibility to do what makes sense for their budgets and activities, while not penalizing Virginians who work in the bottled water industry.
“The governor is commitment to conservation and preservation and has directed state agencies and departments to do everything they can to conserve, be efficient and recycle at every opportunity. It is the governor’s expectation that they will be good and responsible stewards of our natural resources,” Johnson said.
According to data from the International Bottled Water Association, the bottled-water industry in Virginia had a direct economic impact in 2009 of $1 million in wages and spending and encompassed 3,719 jobs all told.
“When the ban came in from Tim Kaine, which we saw as an overt political tip of the hat to environmentalists, because they were on a rampage about bottled water – if he had been serious about plastic bottles, he’d have also banned sodas. We knew it was more of a tip of the hat to environmentalists who were obviously having influence over him and his decisionmaking,” Saxman said.
The bottom line, to Saxman: “There’s just no story here.”
Story by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.
Related posts:
- Saxman, Leighty to host town hall in Staunton Staunton State Del. Chris Saxman will be cohosting a bipartisan town-hall meeting next week with former Mark Warner and Tim Kaine chief of staff Bill...
- The Pulse | What Will Saxman Do? I can hardly make it a day without somebody asking me a variation of that question. It’s known on both sides of the political fence...
- Team Coverage | Saxman drops out of 20th District race Staunton Republican State Del. Chris Saxman confirmed the bombshell news – that he is withdrawing from the 20th House District race to “pursue new opportunities.”...
- Saxman explains decision I met with Chris Saxman for an hour and a half Tuesday morning to talk school choice, an issue that the Staunton Republican has made...
- Developing – Saxman to drop out? The Daily News-Record is reporting this morning that 20th District Republican State Del. Chris Saxman is expected to announce today he will step down from...
Comments
6 Responses to “Saxman on lifting of bottled-water ban: ‘There’s just no story here’”Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying about this post...-
best price laptops Recently, I did not give lots of consideration to leaving responses on site page reports and have positioned responses even less. Reading through by way of your enjoyable article, will assist me to do so sometimes….
Recently, I did not give lots of consideration to leaving responses on site page reports and have positioned responses even less. Reading through by way of your enjoyable article, will assist me to do so sometimes….
That’s a lot of words for a non-story! $100,000+/yr in contracts because of your political access isn’t chump change no matter how many times you tell the Free Press it isn’t. And sure, Saxman benefited from former contracts with the State, but the fact is Kaine shut-off the spigot and McDonell turned it back on. Why? Well, that’s the story and a good one at that. Saxman’s babble about sodas misses the point as well. The State doesn’t make sure every resident has Coke flowing from their tap. If the state has confidence in the tap water it provides, why would it spend, in these times of fiscal hardship, scarce taxpayer dollars on bottled water? Oh Chris Saxman, sometimes the best public relations is just keeping quiet when you’re in the wrong.
Howard,
once again you missed the points
1) the ban didnt even impact us because it was on single serving containers
2) I never spoke with anyone in state government about the ban -ever.
3) we have sold five gallon water to state agencies for over 30 years
4) there is a competitive bid process
5) the money spent also includes coolers, filter coolers and coffee supplies
6) we are not in the wrong here
7) if a state agency wants to drink tap water they can make that decision on their own. no one is requiring bottled water unless it is written into the contract because potable water is not accessible.
I will push back on this kind of story every time.
We have built a business based on great products, quality services and fair pricing. We will never accept this kind of journalism.
One point we can make clear: We contacted Chris Saxman on this. Chris didn’t seek us out. His comments in the story were in response to our query on the topic.
Chris,
This is not about the plastic, or environmentalists on a rampage, or political threats. This issue is about spending money on a product that is frivolous and destructive. The Governor is charged with providing clean, safe, and affordable public tap water…why would he undermine this by buying commercially processed public water that happens to come in a plastic container at 1,000s of times the cost. He is supporting an industry that takes what should be a public resource, our water, and appropriates it to the highest bidder. We are in a tough jobs situation, but this is not the kind of industry we should support at all and not the waste of taxpayer money that we can allow to happen.
Peter,
Our sources are not public, they are private, natural springs.
The bids go to the LOWEST bidder not the highest.
What would have happened to the Gulf Coast region were there not a bottled water industry before Katrina and Rita hit? We shipped in over 150,000,000 servings within two weeks.
Let alone when Craigsville’s system was unable to provide water?
Our bottles, in our PRIMARY product, are reused about 36 times before we fully recycle them.
The cost per serving is very low and has very little waste.
That’s why some, not all, state offices purchase our products and services. There is no requirement and the ban didnt impact us.
The