Cuccinelli weighs in on immigration enforcement
It’s settled, according to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli – local and state law-enforcement officers in Virginia can ask about the immigration status of anyone stopped or arrested.
This is from a legal opinion issued by the attorney general’s office last week to answer a question posed by State Del. Bob Marshall, a social conservative who has made the immigration issue a political issue.
“The official opinion that Virginia law enforcement officers may inquire into the immigration status of persons stopped or arrested simply declares what is existing law,” begins the statement from the attorney general’s office released to the news media on Tuesday on the legal opinion.
“In the context of a legal law enforcement stop or arrest, there is no legal distinction between immigration crimes and any other crime. What a law enforcement officer can and cannot ask in a citizen encounter is the same whether the underlying concern is an immigration violation or a bank robbery.”
The question from Marshall specifically asked about the power of local and state law-enforcement officers to perform background checks in similar circumstances as persons can be questioned pursuant to the controversial new immigration law in Arizona – and also if such powers were extended under state code to local zoning officers and state-park administrators.
The answers from Cuccinelli – yes on the law-enforcement and state-park administrators questions, no on the local zoning officers.
Marshall in a news release Tuesday used the opportunity of the public release by the attorney general to play some more politics with immigration.
“The federal government has abdicated its responsibility to law abiding citizens by allowing illegal aliens who commit crimes to continue to reside in our country. As a result states like Arizona and Virginia have to stand together to do what we can to reduce crime from gangs like MS-13 who are known to recruit out of country and bring new gang members into the United States illegally. In Virginia I hope that allowing our law enforcement officers to check the legal presence of those who are arrested for other crimes will help reduce crime in general,” Marshall said in a statement.
A statement from Adam Sharp, the chair of the Family Caucus of the Virginia Young Democrats, put a decidedly different spin on the Cuccinelli announcement.
“Attorney General Cuccinelli has ripped away the welcome mat for hundreds of thousands of residents of Virginia,” Sharp said. “Law-abiding legal immigrants who are raising families and growing our economy will now potentially have to prove their right to be here every time they interact with law enforcement. Today’s opinion should send a chill through every chamber of commerce in the Commonwealth. The attorney general’s message is clear: Virginia is closed to talent, closed to growth and closed for business if that talent, growth and business isn’t white.”
Story by Chris Graham. Chris can be reached at freepress2@ntelos.net.
Keywords: ken cuccinelli immigration, bob marshall immigration, illegal immigration virginia
Related posts:
- Cuccinelli joins group backing Arizona immigration law Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has joined a coalition of nine states filing an amicus brief in federal court supporting Arizona’s new immigration reform law. “In...
- Overdue immigration reform Column by Bob Goodlatte The United States of America is a nation of immigrants. Legal immigration has blessed our nation with talent, diversity, and a...
- Much-needed immigration reforms Column by Bob Goodlatte The United States of America is a nation of immigrants. Legal immigration has blessed our nation with talent, diversity, and a...
- Dems file another FOIA on Cuccinelli lawsuit Edited by Chris Graham freepress2@ntelos.net The legal tug-of-war between Virginia Democrats and Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli over Cuccinelli’s lawsuit on federal health-care reform intensified...
- Cuccinelli announces goals, transition team On Thursday, Attorney General-elect Ken Cuccinelli announced his goals for his transition to taking office as the attorney general of Virginia on Jan. 16, 2010....
I guess the real test will be if an officer can arrest a person for not having proof of citizenship with them… and if that is allowable, then how evenly will the “arrested-for-not-carrying-papers” be carried out amongst citizens of all ethnic groups?
Reading State Del. Bob Marshall’s simplistic statement:
“The federal government has abdicated its responsibility to law abiding citizens by allowing illegal aliens who commit crimes to continue to reside in our country. As a result states like Arizona and Virginia have to stand together to do what we can to reduce crime from gangs like MS-13 who are known to recruit out of country and bring new gang members into the United States illegally.”
I’m inspired to add some of my own simplistic statements:
Attorney General Cuccinelli, as the chief law enforcement official of Virginia, has abdicated his responsibility to law abiding citizens by allowing criminals to continue to reside in our state.
If gangs like MS-13 are operating within Virginia, then it’s the Attorney General’s obligation to eliminate those gangs. If they exist in Virginia, then evidently, the Attorney General has abdicated his responsibility.
Marshall also says:
“In the context of a legal law enforcement stop or arrest, there is no legal distinction between immigration crimes and any other crime.”
Does this then mean that state and local law enforcement, in the context of a legal law enforcement stop or arrest, must now also inquire not only about immigration status but also about other crimes like espionage, counterfeiting, war crimes, international art theft, high seas piracy, etc. …usually the purview of federal officials.
A simple speeding ticket might now result in a half-hour written test to inquire about all possible crimes which, by Bob Marshall’s opinion, have no legal distinction between them.