Mark Warner | The cost of reform
As our health-care debate continues, I’m reminded that Virginians hired me last fall to help change the way things are done in Washington and to make sure the federal government is more responsible with taxpayer dollars, even in times of crisis.
Reforming our health-care system is essential to ensuring a prosperous future and it cannot wait. But I am concerned that far too little attention is being paid to containing the cost of any potential reform plan.
The status quo is not sustainable. But we cannot spend away our future to achieve the health reform we need.
That’s why I joined eight fellow freshman senators last week in a letter to Sen. Max Baucus, chairman of the Finance Committee. In our letter, we commend the chairman’s efforts to achieve bipartisan support for health care reform legislation.
But we also make a critical request: We must renew our focus on containing costs – before it’s too late.
As recently-elected members of the Senate, we all know first-hand that Americans desire health care reform.
We also know that the United States can’t afford the consequences of inaction. We’re already spending 17 percent of our GDP on health care – more than any other industrialized country – and that number will only go up if Congress does not act.
Our business community can’t afford the status quo, either. They are already at a serious disadvantage as they compete with firms around the globe because our businesses spend so much more than foreign competitors on skyrocketing health care costs.
And our government cannot afford to miss this window of opportunity because growth in healthcare costs threatens to bankrupt the government. We absolutely must get a handle on this challenge.
I’m working with my colleagues to make sure this discussion remains focused on cost reduction as well as expanded coverage. Our letter is just a small part of our continuing effort to bring a sustainable, sensible approach to health reform.
Mark Warner represents Virginia in the United States Senate.
Related posts:
- Jessica Masulli | Reform health care A large portion of our spending goes toward health care, yet many Americans do not have health insurance. And, even for insured Americans, it is...
- Mark Warner | Enhancing health-care choices for seniors I want to take a moment to keep you updated on health reform legislation I have introduced in the Senate. Last week, I submitted a...
- Mark Warner | Protecting consumers from fraud, credit card abuses Our recent efforts in Washington are focused on consumer relief and protection as we continue working to reinvigorate our sluggish economy. I am very hopeful...
- Team Coverage | Mark Warner visits Staunton U.S. Sen. Mark Warner held a town-hall meeting with area residents in Staunton on Thursday. AFP editor Chris Graham reports across the media platforms. The...
- Greg Marrow | Fair health-care reform As you know, I’ve been campaigning for health-care reform. Many of you are as passionate as I am about fair health-care reform. We cannot allow...
The Baucus “compromised compromise” will exclude millions of Americans from coverage and is a capitulation to the health insurance companies that currently have a strangle hold on the ability of ALL Americans to access quality health care.
As well-meaning as Mr. Warner may be, he is listening to a shrilling minority of voices that lack the political courage and strength of will to ensure that all Americans can safeguard their health.
I’m almost to the point of wondering if Hillary shouldn’t have been the nominee. She could keep Blue Dogs and Blue Dog wanna-bes in line.
This is why I voted for Warner. The man does not impress as a politician, rather a straight thinker looking for what’s best and looking past partisan pressure.
There is NO doubt that we need to reform aspects of our health care system but allowing the government to take over health insurance with a “government option”
thinly disguised by Obama to “keep the insurance companies honest” would be tragic.
The government does not need to take over health care and does not need a 1,000 page bill, to make medical care available to those in need. As more and more leaks out about what this bill contains, it’s clear we need a simpler, not to mention more cost effective approach.