Still giving him the benefit of the doubt
Fear and Loathing in Waynesboro column by Chris Graham
freepress2@ntelos.net
An AFP reader raised a good point in a comment today on our team coverage of yesterday’s city-council reorganization.
“Bruce Allen’s comment in the News Virginian about Mr. Walker’s firing … ‘some issues were personnel issues,’ bothers some of us. … How would Mr. Allen know about personnel issues when he was not on council until yesterday!”
The comment in question had slipped my attention until the post from our friend Charles. Speaking of the effective firing of Walker, who had served as city manager for five and a half years before formally stepping down on Monday, at the urging of Allen, new mayor Tim Williams and new vice mayor Frank Lucente, who told Walker shortly after the May 6 elections that he could resign or face being fired when the new city-council majority took office on July 1, Allen said, “(A) lot of it is personnel issues that can’t be discussed. There are a lot of issues there. Citizens aren’t aware of all the issues and why the decision was made.”
OK, then, first question – if “a lot of it is personnel issues that can’t be discussed,” to borrow from the point raised by our friend Charles, how was it that Allen was made aware of them? Allen was a private citizen until taking office on Tuesday. Who briefed him on the personnel issues that Allen is hinting shouldn’t be discussed in public because they are internal city-council matters?
We can eliminate Walker from the list of suspects there. I think we can safely mark off council members Nancy Dowdy and Lorie Smith.
Question two – if Allen is getting this insider information weeks in advance of taking the oath of office, how insider can this information be? Allen himself points to the fact that “(c)itizens aren’t aware of all the issues and why the decision was made.” So come clean, then, Bruce. Tell us “why the decision was made.” You’ve laid it out there for us. There are “issues.” One you referenced in your chat with the NV. “I just didn’t think he was taking the city in the direction it needed to go.” Which would be fine in and of itself, if that’s all it was. But you’re saying there’s more. I’d like to know more about the more.
A preface for my third question – Allen nonsensically began his comment to the NV about how “a lot of it is personnel issues that can’t be discussed” and “(c)itizens aren’t aware of all the issues and why the decision was made” with the statement that “(a) lot of the city, people I’ve talked to, understand why the decision was made the way it was.” Foregoing a backsmack at the twisted logic that exists here, which reminds me of the famous Yogi Berra yarn about how nobody was going to a particular popular restaurant in St. Louis anymore because it was “too crowded,” my question – who are these people?
Wait, I think I know …
“It was very, very obvious to me that the guy they were going to back was going to have it out for Walker. From the very beginning. From the get-go. There was no question about that. I was left with clearly the impression that they wanted Walker fired. I don’t know that anybody said, They ought to fire him, but there was no question in my mind what the right answer was.”
That’s from my column on Tree Streets resident John Lawrence, who was interviewed by a faction of city and county businessmen to run as their candidate for the Ward B seat on city council. The ringleaders in that group all showed up as significant backers to the Allen campaign in his most recent campaign-finance report.
It’s probably safe to say that Allen didn’t come up with what he told the NV on his own, but I’ll still give him the benefit of the doubt. I mean, the guy has been on city council for all of two days now.
Even so, it’s not the best of starts for a man who absolutely does not want to go down in history being known as “Frank Lucente’s boy.”
Related posts:
- The benefit of the doubt (for now) Special Commentary by Chris Graham freepress2@ntelos.net I’m curious as to what Bruce Allen was trying to convey when he said this morning, “I’m here to...
- New Day Dawning Fear and Loathing in Waynesboro column by Chris Graham freepress2@ntelos.net “We’re going to undo everything you’ve done the past five years. You don’t want to...
- The loudest silence I’ve ever heard Fear and Loathing in Waynesboro column by Chris Graham freepress2@ntelos.net Silence. Absolute silence. That’s what we’ve gotten from Bruce Allen regarding the effective firing of...
- Hamp named interim city manager Fear and Loathing in Waynesboro column by Chris Graham freepress2@ntelos.net Assistant city manager Mike Hamp will serve as the interim city manager when the clock...
- Why not talk about Walker plans before the election? Fear and Loathing in Waynesboro column by Chris Graham freepress2@ntelos.net We’ve known each other for a long time, and I’ve known him to be a...
“I just didn’t think he was taking the city in the direction it needed to go.” Interesting, in as much as it was Council, not Doug who determined “direction.”
Seems if it wasn’t for Walker, the city wouldn’t have gone anywhere. I recall quite clearly conversations I had, as manager of VM, with DEQ. After deciding what we could do with rain water run-off that was in violation before it hit the ground, the question was raised, what is wrong with your local government? Seems that the issue of sewage treatment was bubbling over at the time (no pun intended, I think). The point was made that if the city didn’t respond to DEQ requirements, very bad / expensive things would happen. It is only now, 25 years later, that Walker worked out the financing to make the needed upgrades.
“taking the city in the right direction”???? My fear is growing that Mr Allen is no more than a useful idiot for the Gang of Two + one.
Charles
That was a real high class comment he made. Inuendo without having to back it up with facts. Implying to readers that bad things were going on that we did not know about. Allen should not be implying negative things about anybody in the newspaper unless he can back it up so that we can make the decisions for ourselves. How can anybody defend themselves against that type of inuendo. Walker has shown nothing but class, but council members who are feeling heat are using inuendo to smear Walker’s image.
Once again I wonder, why did they not tell people before the election that they wanted to get rid of Walker . Why didn’t Allen at least meet with Walker. I am politically very conservative but I can not support people who deceive the public. This was obviously decided before the election. Allen obviously knew about it before the election. So if it was ok for Allen to get insider personel information before the election then why wasn’t it ok for the voters to get the same information. He needs to be asked these questions in front of a microphone without being given several weeks to come up with an answer.